header-logo header-logo

14 March 2014
Issue: 7598 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Flight fight

PI lawyer says Montréal Convention on air travel is outdated

The Montréal Convention on air travel needs “revisiting” to meet the rights of disabled passengers, a spinal injuries specialist solicitor has argued.

Where EU law conflicts with the Convention on disability rights, the Convention wins, leaving a disabled passenger with no remedy in a recent Supreme Court case, Stott v Thomas Cook [2014] UKSC 15, [2014] All ER (D) 30 (Mar).

Slater & Gordon solicitor Catherine Leech says the judge accepted that Thomas Cook had breached their duty under EU regulations, but that no award could be made because the regulations were incompatible with the more powerful Convention.

“It is surely time for this piece of legislation to be given a complete overhaul,” says Leech. “The origins of the Montréal Convention are almost 100 years old.”

 

Issue: 7598 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll