header-logo header-logo

31 July 2009 / James Pirrie
Issue: 7380 / Categories: Features , Family , ADR
printer mail-detail

Follow the (ADR) crowd

Global meltdown presents practitioners with a great opportunity for ADR, says James Pirrie

Practitioners are caught in a conundrum. How can we drive towards a clean break by capitalising maintenance when we don’t know if clients will have a job in a year’s time, let alone the bonus that used to make up so substantial a part of the fmaily’s income?

Even if we pass this hurdle, then the Duxbury assumptions—even as updated—seem a crude structure for long-term prediction in the light of recent fluctuations.

For most people “separation” means disposing of assets to fund different lives going forward. However, in the current climate, disposal is difficult to achieve—family homes won’t sell, clients are reluctant to sell share-holdings that they insist are below their true value—holiday homes may be unsellable at any figure.

Even if clients are prepared to borrow to move things forward, the funding is unlikely to be provided in the sort of amounts needed.

Three-stage separation

What has happened in consequence is that a new chapter of separation has

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll