header-logo header-logo

31 July 2009 / James Pirrie
Issue: 7380 / Categories: Features , Family , ADR
printer mail-detail

Follow the (ADR) crowd

Global meltdown presents practitioners with a great opportunity for ADR, says James Pirrie

Practitioners are caught in a conundrum. How can we drive towards a clean break by capitalising maintenance when we don’t know if clients will have a job in a year’s time, let alone the bonus that used to make up so substantial a part of the fmaily’s income?

Even if we pass this hurdle, then the Duxbury assumptions—even as updated—seem a crude structure for long-term prediction in the light of recent fluctuations.

For most people “separation” means disposing of assets to fund different lives going forward. However, in the current climate, disposal is difficult to achieve—family homes won’t sell, clients are reluctant to sell share-holdings that they insist are below their true value—holiday homes may be unsellable at any figure.

Even if clients are prepared to borrow to move things forward, the funding is unlikely to be provided in the sort of amounts needed.

Three-stage separation

What has happened in consequence is that a new chapter of separation has

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll