header-logo header-logo

24 January 2018
Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Follow the money

A new anti-money laundering (AML) watchdog could create more bureaucracy for already hard-pressed solicitors, a lawyer has warned.

The Office for Professional Body Anti-Money Laundering Supervision (OPBAS) launched last week. It has powers to monitor the Law Society and other supervisory bodies, impose financial penalties, and publicly censure non-compliant organisations.

However, Caroline Day, partner at Kingsley Napley, said: ‘This new watchdog is designed to be a “supervisor” of supervisors. The intention is for OPBAS to reinforce AML in the UK, but whether this will also add unnecessary layers of bureaucratic supervision remains to be seen.’

The Law Society also raised concerns about transparency during the consultation last year, and cautioned that OPBAS would not ‘add value’.

Meanwhile, law firms have been told they have until 2 February to provide information required by new AML regulations. All firms should have received forms from the Solicitors Regulation Authority this week.

Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson appoints Vicky Tomlinson as Head of Independent Health and Care

DWF—five appointments

DWF—five appointments

DWF further strengthens major injury and casualty offering with new partner and four directors from DAC Beachcroft

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis strengthens Grimsby child care team

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll