header-logo header-logo

Follow the money

24 January 2018
Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

A new anti-money laundering (AML) watchdog could create more bureaucracy for already hard-pressed solicitors, a lawyer has warned.

The Office for Professional Body Anti-Money Laundering Supervision (OPBAS) launched last week. It has powers to monitor the Law Society and other supervisory bodies, impose financial penalties, and publicly censure non-compliant organisations.

However, Caroline Day, partner at Kingsley Napley, said: ‘This new watchdog is designed to be a “supervisor” of supervisors. The intention is for OPBAS to reinforce AML in the UK, but whether this will also add unnecessary layers of bureaucratic supervision remains to be seen.’

The Law Society also raised concerns about transparency during the consultation last year, and cautioned that OPBAS would not ‘add value’.

Meanwhile, law firms have been told they have until 2 February to provide information required by new AML regulations. All firms should have received forms from the Solicitors Regulation Authority this week.

Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll