header-logo header-logo

24 January 2018
Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Follow the money

A new anti-money laundering (AML) watchdog could create more bureaucracy for already hard-pressed solicitors, a lawyer has warned.

The Office for Professional Body Anti-Money Laundering Supervision (OPBAS) launched last week. It has powers to monitor the Law Society and other supervisory bodies, impose financial penalties, and publicly censure non-compliant organisations.

However, Caroline Day, partner at Kingsley Napley, said: ‘This new watchdog is designed to be a “supervisor” of supervisors. The intention is for OPBAS to reinforce AML in the UK, but whether this will also add unnecessary layers of bureaucratic supervision remains to be seen.’

The Law Society also raised concerns about transparency during the consultation last year, and cautioned that OPBAS would not ‘add value’.

Meanwhile, law firms have been told they have until 2 February to provide information required by new AML regulations. All firms should have received forms from the Solicitors Regulation Authority this week.

Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Restructuring and insolvency practice strengthened by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

North West residential development team welcomes partner and associate

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Family law boutique expands London team with legal director hire

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
back-to-top-scroll