header-logo header-logo

06 December 2024 / Gustavo Moser
Issue: 8097 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Contract
printer mail-detail

Force majeure: steering through uncertainty

200296
Gustavo Moser sheds light on the nuances of negotiating & enforcing force majeure clauses
  • Tailored protection: customise force majeure clauses for optimal coverage in unforeseen circumstances, safeguarding against potential losses.
  • Clear accountability: define triggers and obligations to enhance contract management, eliminate ambiguity and ensure accountability.
  • Strategic legal choice: select a suitable legal framework for effective enforcement, protecting parties’ intentions and enabling efficient dispute resolution

In the midst of worldwide uncertainties such as the pandemic, armed conflicts, financial upheavals, natural calamities and trade restrictions, force majeure (FM) clauses have sparked the interest of the legal community. These unforeseen events, whether detailed in contracts or enshrined in statutory laws, are now critical considerations for practitioners and decision-makers alike.

Against the backdrop of the volatile economic and geopolitical scene, crafting an FM clause with precision is key to building a robust contractual base. This strategic approach is particularly indispensable for entities venturing through turbulent industry sectors and territories that are known to be susceptible to sudden disruptions and uncertainties (geopolitical instability, economic

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll