header-logo header-logo

Forced labour?

11 July 2013 / Matthew Fraser
Issue: 7568 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail
istock_000021807596medium

Should we introduce compulsory pro bono work for trainee lawyers, asks Matthew Fraser

From January 2015 all applicants to the New York Bar will be required to carry out 50 hours of legal pro bono work. Should this requirement be introduced for trainee lawyers in our jurisdiction in order for them to qualify?

Belgium

In the case of Van Der Mussele v Belgium (App No 8919/80), a newly qualified Belgian avocat asked the European Court of Human Rights to consider whether the compulsory pro bono work required of Belgian pupil avocats constituted “forced labour” contrary to Art 4 of the Convention. Many pro bono supporters may be shocked to discover that the question of “forced labour” was deemed worthy of consideration by the European Court.

But the court’s conclusions in relation to both the individual and social benefits of a pro bono requirement were sensible. The court found no violation of Art 4, on four grounds. First, the pro bono work was within the scope of the ordinary activities of an avocat.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll