header-logo header-logo

Forced labour?

11 July 2013 / Matthew Fraser
Issue: 7568 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail
istock_000021807596medium

Should we introduce compulsory pro bono work for trainee lawyers, asks Matthew Fraser

From January 2015 all applicants to the New York Bar will be required to carry out 50 hours of legal pro bono work. Should this requirement be introduced for trainee lawyers in our jurisdiction in order for them to qualify?

Belgium

In the case of Van Der Mussele v Belgium (App No 8919/80), a newly qualified Belgian avocat asked the European Court of Human Rights to consider whether the compulsory pro bono work required of Belgian pupil avocats constituted “forced labour” contrary to Art 4 of the Convention. Many pro bono supporters may be shocked to discover that the question of “forced labour” was deemed worthy of consideration by the European Court.

But the court’s conclusions in relation to both the individual and social benefits of a pro bono requirement were sensible. The court found no violation of Art 4, on four grounds. First, the pro bono work was within the scope of the ordinary activities of an avocat.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll