header-logo header-logo

11 July 2013 / Matthew Fraser
Issue: 7568 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus , Legal services , Profession
printer mail-detail

Forced labour?

istock_000021807596medium

Should we introduce compulsory pro bono work for trainee lawyers, asks Matthew Fraser

From January 2015 all applicants to the New York Bar will be required to carry out 50 hours of legal pro bono work. Should this requirement be introduced for trainee lawyers in our jurisdiction in order for them to qualify?

Belgium

In the case of Van Der Mussele v Belgium (App No 8919/80), a newly qualified Belgian avocat asked the European Court of Human Rights to consider whether the compulsory pro bono work required of Belgian pupil avocats constituted “forced labour” contrary to Art 4 of the Convention. Many pro bono supporters may be shocked to discover that the question of “forced labour” was deemed worthy of consideration by the European Court.

But the court’s conclusions in relation to both the individual and social benefits of a pro bono requirement were sensible. The court found no violation of Art 4, on four grounds. First, the pro bono work was within the scope of the ordinary activities of an avocat.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll