header-logo header-logo

30 September 2016 / Kathryn Purkis , Kathryn Purkis
Issue: 7716 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Forcing the issue

nlj_7716_purkis

Kathryn Purkis provides a comparative view of family provision in the British Isles

  • The different countries of the British Isles have varied approaches to mitigating capricious or unfair wills. Scotland and Jersey are thinking about the fairness and workability of their forced heirship arrangements, but neither has an appetite for throwing these away in favour of English-style statutory provision.

Some legal questions engender a single clear answer, others are more nuanced. What is the optimal arrangement for family provision when a will cuts out close kith and kin? This is a minority concern—because about two-thirds of people across the UK die intestate—but it is still important. The issue is currently being discussed in Jersey and Scotland, both of which have systems of forced heirship. There is limited appetite there to adopt the English solution.

Context

These days, many English and Welsh lawyers think of freedom of testation as a hallmark of a free and liberal society, and cannot imagine how things could be otherwise in their jurisdiction. But they used to be:

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll