header-logo header-logo

Forcing the issue

30 September 2016 / Kathryn Purkis , Kathryn Purkis
Issue: 7716 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail
nlj_7716_purkis

Kathryn Purkis provides a comparative view of family provision in the British Isles

  • The different countries of the British Isles have varied approaches to mitigating capricious or unfair wills. Scotland and Jersey are thinking about the fairness and workability of their forced heirship arrangements, but neither has an appetite for throwing these away in favour of English-style statutory provision.

Some legal questions engender a single clear answer, others are more nuanced. What is the optimal arrangement for family provision when a will cuts out close kith and kin? This is a minority concern—because about two-thirds of people across the UK die intestate—but it is still important. The issue is currently being discussed in Jersey and Scotland, both of which have systems of forced heirship. There is limited appetite there to adopt the English solution.

Context

These days, many English and Welsh lawyers think of freedom of testation as a hallmark of a free and liberal society, and cannot imagine how things could be otherwise in their jurisdiction. But they used to be:

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll