header-logo header-logo

02 March 2007 / Mark Pawlowski
Issue: 7262 / Categories: Features , Local government , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Forfeiture relief

Mark Pawlowski considers the court’s power to relieve an unlawful killer from forfeiture of the victim’s estate

The common law rule of public policy, which prevents a person who has unlawfully killed another from profiting from that death, is intended to act as a disincentive to criminal activity and to reflect public conscience. At the same time, the Forfeiture Act 1982 (FoA 1982) is intended to militate against the strict application of this rule by giving the court power to grant relief to people found guilty of unlawful killing, other than murder, from forfeiture of their inheritance and other similar rights.

The forfeiture rule

One of the leading authorities is Cleaver v Mutual Rescue Fund Life Association [1892] 1 QB 147, in which a husband took out an insurance policy on his life with the defendant for £2,000 in favour of his wife. He subsequently died from poison that had been intentionally administered by his wife who was later convicted of his wilful murder. Applying the forfeiture rule, the Court of Appeal held that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Family law boutique expands London team with legal director hire

Ward Hadaway—Mike Gore

Ward Hadaway—Mike Gore

Firm enhances advisory capability with strategic risk specialist hire

Stewarts—Alexandra Lyons

Stewarts—Alexandra Lyons

Insurance and reinsurance specialist joins policyholder disputes practice as partner

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
back-to-top-scroll