header-logo header-logo

31 March 2021 / John Bowers KC
Issue: 7927 / Categories: Features , Employment , Child law , Public , Tribunals
printer mail-detail

Foster carers: neither employees nor workers?

44722
Is the role of the foster carer slowly shifting? John Bowers QC considers the evidence
  • To what extent can foster carers be considered employees or workers? Recent cases considering this question are confined to their own facts, but a shift may be occurring.

The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) in Scotland in Glasgow City Council (appellant) v Johnstone and another (respondents) [2020] IRLR 908 considered a particular type of foster carer, and found that they were employees. This decision reflects a divergence from the long-established position in England (where there are several further cases awaiting judgment), but can be explained on the rather specific facts of the case.

Previous UK foster carer cases

The previous UK case law on ‘mainstream’ foster carers has been consistent over many years in confirming that they are neither employees nor workers, although primarily this is on the basis that the relationship was entirely regulated by statute. The absence of a contractual relationship between the foster carer and the local authority

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll