header-logo header-logo

Foster carers: neither employees nor workers?

31 March 2021 / John Bowers KC
Issue: 7927 / Categories: Features , Employment , Child law , Public , Tribunals
printer mail-detail
44722
Is the role of the foster carer slowly shifting? John Bowers QC considers the evidence
  • To what extent can foster carers be considered employees or workers? Recent cases considering this question are confined to their own facts, but a shift may be occurring.

The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) in Scotland in Glasgow City Council (appellant) v Johnstone and another (respondents) [2020] IRLR 908 considered a particular type of foster carer, and found that they were employees. This decision reflects a divergence from the long-established position in England (where there are several further cases awaiting judgment), but can be explained on the rather specific facts of the case.

Previous UK foster carer cases

The previous UK case law on ‘mainstream’ foster carers has been consistent over many years in confirming that they are neither employees nor workers, although primarily this is on the basis that the relationship was entirely regulated by statute. The absence of a contractual relationship between the foster carer and the local authority

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll