header-logo header-logo

Fracking & protestors

26 September 2014 / Nicholas Asprey
Issue: 7623 / Categories: Features , Human rights , Property
printer mail-detail
fracking

Nicholas Asprey addresses the issues arising in claims against protesters

The growing search for shale oil and gas is supported and encouraged by the government because it believes that the exploitation of these reserves has the potential to provide the UK with greater energy security, growth and jobs. The only way to find out whether the reserves are technically and economically recoverable is by exploratory drilling. This is an expensive, long and uncertain operation and the government has been at pains to remove unnecessary legal obstacles which might discourage exploration companies from proceeding.

Thus the government has amended the planning procedures so that companies applying for planning permission for the winning and working of oil or natural gas are no longer required to serve notice on the owners of land which is to be used solely for underground drilling (The Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure and Section 62A Applications) (England) (Amendment No 2) Order 2013 (SI 2013/3194). In May it issued a consultation paper on a proposal to grant automatic access

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll