header-logo header-logo

Fracking & protestors

26 September 2014 / Nicholas Asprey
Issue: 7623 / Categories: Features , Human rights , Property
printer mail-detail
fracking

Nicholas Asprey addresses the issues arising in claims against protesters

The growing search for shale oil and gas is supported and encouraged by the government because it believes that the exploitation of these reserves has the potential to provide the UK with greater energy security, growth and jobs. The only way to find out whether the reserves are technically and economically recoverable is by exploratory drilling. This is an expensive, long and uncertain operation and the government has been at pains to remove unnecessary legal obstacles which might discourage exploration companies from proceeding.

Thus the government has amended the planning procedures so that companies applying for planning permission for the winning and working of oil or natural gas are no longer required to serve notice on the owners of land which is to be used solely for underground drilling (The Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure and Section 62A Applications) (England) (Amendment No 2) Order 2013 (SI 2013/3194). In May it issued a consultation paper on a proposal to grant automatic access

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll