header-logo header-logo

26 September 2014 / Nicholas Asprey
Issue: 7623 / Categories: Features , Human rights , Property
printer mail-detail

Fracking & protestors

fracking

Nicholas Asprey addresses the issues arising in claims against protesters

The growing search for shale oil and gas is supported and encouraged by the government because it believes that the exploitation of these reserves has the potential to provide the UK with greater energy security, growth and jobs. The only way to find out whether the reserves are technically and economically recoverable is by exploratory drilling. This is an expensive, long and uncertain operation and the government has been at pains to remove unnecessary legal obstacles which might discourage exploration companies from proceeding.

Thus the government has amended the planning procedures so that companies applying for planning permission for the winning and working of oil or natural gas are no longer required to serve notice on the owners of land which is to be used solely for underground drilling (The Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure and Section 62A Applications) (England) (Amendment No 2) Order 2013 (SI 2013/3194). In May it issued a consultation paper on a proposal to grant automatic access

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll