header-logo header-logo

08 December 2021
Issue: 7960 / Categories: Legal News , Fraud
printer mail-detail

Fraud & the justice system

The Justice Committee has issued a call for evidence on the criminal justice system’s approach to tackling fraud, which accounts for about half of all crimes

The committee will look at how fraud is investigated and prosecuted in the courts, including the roles of the Crown Prosecution Service and Serious Fraud Office, the experiences of those working in the legal system, plans to tackle online fraud, and problems with evidence and disclosure in the prosecution of fraud. It aims to hold formal evidence sessions in the new year.

The majority of fraud occurs through the use of digital technology, which means it can be perpetrated from other countries, and is estimated to cost the UK more than £137bn per year. The first half of 2021 saw a 285% rise in online fraud such as phishing and text scams, fuelled by the increased use of online platforms during the pandemic.

Committee chair Sir Bob Neil MP said: ‘The ever-increasing use of online platforms, particularly during the pandemic, has seen a huge increase in cases of fraud while making it easier for criminals to operate across borders. ‘

However, Louise Hodges, head of criminal litigation at Kingsley Napley, warned ‘quick fixes are tricky’ and solutions would require investment.

‘Several different agencies have been focusing on this area in recent years and the increase in online fraud has already featured in many reports and action plans,’ she said.

‘Yet we have seen a reduction in regional and local fraud squads with specialism in lower level of frauds lost and investment in expertise to combat online fraud not keeping pace with the reality. It is sustained and meaningful investment to keep pace with the criminal community and to bring perpetrators to justice that is required.’

Reply in no more than 3,000 words by 17 January through the online portal.

 

Issue: 7960 / Categories: Legal News , Fraud
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll