header-logo header-logo

Freedom of expression: what’s acceptable? Pt 2

16 May 2025 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 8116 / Categories: Features , Discrimination , Human rights , Employment
printer mail-detail
218610
Nicholas Dobson follows up on Higgs v Farmor’s School, examining the Court of Appeal judgment on a gross misconduct dismissal
  • In a follow-up to his 2023 article on Higgs v Farmor’s School, ‘Freedom of expression: what’s acceptable?’, the author analyses the recent Court of Appeal judgment.
  • The court found that the claimant’s dismissal for re-posting ‘inflammatory’ material on same-sex marriage and gender choice could not proportionately justify her dismissal, which therefore constituted unlawful direct discrimination.

Older people, despite having always lived in England, will nevertheless for many years have inhabited a foreign country—at least in terms of the famous opening of LP Hartley’s 1953 novel, The Go-Between: ‘The past is a foreign country; they do things differently there.’ For what were mainstream views on sex, marriage and gender in the 1950s were, in employment terms, considered dismissible conduct when expressed in 2018.

This was once again apparent when the Court of Appeal revisited on appeal a decision made by the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) in Higgs

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Writing in NLJ this week, Thomas Rothwell and Kavish Shah of Falcon Chambers unpack the surprise inclusion of a ban on upwards-only rent reviews in the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll