header-logo header-logo

12 February 2026
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

Freeths has bolstered its projects and rail practices with the appointment of director Rachel Crosier in London. She joins from A&O Shearman and will work alongside partners James Larmour and Tom Johnson to support growth in specialist PFI/PPP, major projects and rail and wider transport and infrastructure work.

An international infrastructure projects lawyer with more than 14 years’ experience, Crosier advises on the procurement, development, financing, delivery and operation of major schemes and associated regulatory frameworks. Her rail experience includes rolling stock public-private partnerships, major fleet procurements, operational and maintenance arrangements and depot infrastructure across the UK and international markets.

James Larmour said: ‘The infrastructure landscape is becoming increasingly sophisticated, and Rachel’s insight will be invaluable as we support clients through that evolution.’ He added that ‘as demand in this market continues to grow, particularly in specialist rail and transport portfolios, Rachel’s expertise will play an important role in enhancing the breadth and depth of our offering.’

Crosier said: ‘I’m delighted to be joining Freeths at a time when the firm is experiencing such strong growth across its infrastructure, rail and major projects work,’ adding: ‘I look forward to working closely with James, Tom and the wider team to support our clients across these expanding markets.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll