header-logo header-logo

Freezing injunctions in the Caribbean

26 November 2021 / Lois Horne
Issue: 7958 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail
65093
Lois Horne reviews a case where the Privy Council delivered a ‘ground-breaking’ judgment on injunctions
  • An injunction can be granted even in the absence of an underlying cause of action.
  • Privy Council restates the test for freezing injunctions.

On 4 October 2021, an enlarged seven-member Board of the Privy Council delivered its judgment in Convoy Collateral Ltd v Broad Idea International Ltd [2021] UKPC 24. The judgment of Lord Leggatt, with whom the majority of the Board agreed, contains a detailed rationalisation of the court’s powers to grant freezing orders and interim injunctions generally. In the words of Sir Geoffrey Vos (who was in the minority on these points), Lord Leggatt’s judgment amounts to ‘a ground-breaking exposition of the law of injunctions’. Although Lord Leggatt’s comments were strictly speaking obiter dicta, he expressly said that they represent the law in all jurisdictions ‘where courts have inherited the equitable powers of the former Court of Chancery’ (which obviously includes England & Wales) and they are likely to be highly persuasive.

Background

Convoy

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll