header-logo header-logo

26 November 2021 / Lois Horne
Issue: 7958 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Freezing injunctions in the Caribbean

65093
Lois Horne reviews a case where the Privy Council delivered a ‘ground-breaking’ judgment on injunctions
  • An injunction can be granted even in the absence of an underlying cause of action.
  • Privy Council restates the test for freezing injunctions.

On 4 October 2021, an enlarged seven-member Board of the Privy Council delivered its judgment in Convoy Collateral Ltd v Broad Idea International Ltd [2021] UKPC 24. The judgment of Lord Leggatt, with whom the majority of the Board agreed, contains a detailed rationalisation of the court’s powers to grant freezing orders and interim injunctions generally. In the words of Sir Geoffrey Vos (who was in the minority on these points), Lord Leggatt’s judgment amounts to ‘a ground-breaking exposition of the law of injunctions’. Although Lord Leggatt’s comments were strictly speaking obiter dicta, he expressly said that they represent the law in all jurisdictions ‘where courts have inherited the equitable powers of the former Court of Chancery’ (which obviously includes England & Wales) and they are likely to be highly persuasive.

Background

Convoy

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll