header-logo header-logo

Freezing injunctions in the Caribbean

26 November 2021 / Lois Horne
Issue: 7958 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail
65093
Lois Horne reviews a case where the Privy Council delivered a ‘ground-breaking’ judgment on injunctions
  • An injunction can be granted even in the absence of an underlying cause of action.
  • Privy Council restates the test for freezing injunctions.

On 4 October 2021, an enlarged seven-member Board of the Privy Council delivered its judgment in Convoy Collateral Ltd v Broad Idea International Ltd [2021] UKPC 24. The judgment of Lord Leggatt, with whom the majority of the Board agreed, contains a detailed rationalisation of the court’s powers to grant freezing orders and interim injunctions generally. In the words of Sir Geoffrey Vos (who was in the minority on these points), Lord Leggatt’s judgment amounts to ‘a ground-breaking exposition of the law of injunctions’. Although Lord Leggatt’s comments were strictly speaking obiter dicta, he expressly said that they represent the law in all jurisdictions ‘where courts have inherited the equitable powers of the former Court of Chancery’ (which obviously includes England & Wales) and they are likely to be highly persuasive.

Background

Convoy

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll