header-logo header-logo

05 January 2012
Issue: 7495 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Freezing orders

Parbulk II AS v PT Humpuss Intermoda Transportasi TBK and other companies [2011] EWHC 3143 (Comm), [2011] All ER (D) 173 (Dec)

In circumstances where a cause of action defendant, against whom it was appropriate to make a freezing order at the suit of a claimant, had a debt, or other receivable owing to it by a third party, or a claim or potential claim against a third party, the English court had jurisdiction to grant a freezing order against the third party, in appropriate circumstances, to restrain the third party from dissipating its assets up to the amount of its debt to, or the claim by, the judgment debtor. Whether the court would grant a freezing order with respect to a third party would be a matter for the exercise of its discretion.

If, for example, the circumstances showed collusion, or impropriety, or some participation on the part of the third party, in attempts by the defendant to render itself judgment proof, then it might be appropriate for a freezing order to be granted against the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson appoints Vicky Tomlinson as Head of Independent Health and Care

DWF—five appointments

DWF—five appointments

DWF further strengthens major injury and casualty offering with new partner and four directors from DAC Beachcroft

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis strengthens Grimsby child care team

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll