header-logo header-logo

Freezing orders

05 January 2012
Issue: 7495 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Parbulk II AS v PT Humpuss Intermoda Transportasi TBK and other companies [2011] EWHC 3143 (Comm), [2011] All ER (D) 173 (Dec)

In circumstances where a cause of action defendant, against whom it was appropriate to make a freezing order at the suit of a claimant, had a debt, or other receivable owing to it by a third party, or a claim or potential claim against a third party, the English court had jurisdiction to grant a freezing order against the third party, in appropriate circumstances, to restrain the third party from dissipating its assets up to the amount of its debt to, or the claim by, the judgment debtor. Whether the court would grant a freezing order with respect to a third party would be a matter for the exercise of its discretion.

If, for example, the circumstances showed collusion, or impropriety, or some participation on the part of the third party, in attempts by the defendant to render itself judgment proof, then it might be appropriate for a freezing order to be granted against the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll