header-logo header-logo

22 November 2024 / Mary Young , Charlotte Dormon
Issue: 8095 / Categories: Features , Freezing orders
printer mail-detail

Freezing orders in court

197689
Even after five decades of freezing injunctions, the courts are still regularly asked to clarify the law: Mary Young & Charlotte Dormon round up this year’s causes of confusion
  • 2024 has seen a number of cases concerning freezing injunctions in the courts.
  • These have dealt with, among other issues, the correct test of a ‘good arguable case’, the duty to provide full and frank disclosure, and what events might trigger the expiration of a freezing order.

In 2025, the freezing injunction will celebrate its 50th anniversary. While it is a well-established part of the asset recovery specialist’s arsenal, the decisions of 2024 demonstrate that this remains an interesting and developing area of law.

Locus for an order

In August 2024, the Court of Appeal considered whether to uphold a first instance decision setting aside a freezing order made to support foreign (Scottish) proceedings.

Section 25 of the Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982 (CJJA 1982) permits interim relief to be granted in support of foreign proceedings provided that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll