header-logo header-logo

26 July 2018 / George Hepburne Scott
Issue: 7803 / Categories: Features , Brexit , Criminal
printer mail-detail

French prisons in the dock

nlj_7803_scott

George Hepburne Scott reports on a sea-change in the approach to extraditions to France

  • The Administrative Division of the High Court has ruled that there is a real risk that French Prison conditions amount to ‘inhuman or degrading treatment’ of prisoners.

On 12 July 2018, Singh LJ and Carr J handed down the much awaited judgment in Shumba and another v Public Prosecutor in Nanterre County Court, France and others [2018] EWHC 1762 (Admin), [2018] All ER (D) 79 (Jul) the first case in which conditions in French prisons which were criticised by the recent Committee for the Prevention of Torture (CPT) report dated 7 April 2017, have been considered.

The practical impact of this judgment cannot be overstated. It represents a sea-change in the British Court’s approach to extraditions to France and may well complicate the post-Brexit EU-UK extradition negotiations.

In essence, under Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), a court may refuse to extradite a requested person if there is a real risk

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll