header-logo header-logo

Friend or foe? Co-accused & section 34

13 September 2024 / Edward Grange
Issue: 8085 / Categories: Features , Criminal
printer mail-detail
188868
Adverse inference & failure to mention a fact… Edward Grange examines a case that may pave the way for similar defence strategies
  • Examines the case of R v Marsden and the ability of a co-accused to seek an adverse inference under s 34 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994.
  • Considers how a failure to mention a fact when questioned could be utilised at trial not only by the Crown, but also by a suspect seeking to strengthen the case against their co-defendant(s).

Those familiar with criminal trials will be all too aware of the dangers of a co-defendant instigating a ‘cut-throat defence’, where that co-defendant gives evidence on his or her own behalf in order to strengthen the prosecution case against a fellow accused. A co-defendant who was once an ally strays off course and puts the blame for the offending squarely at the feet of their co-accused in order to seek to exonerate themselves. But as the old adage goes, ‘There is more than one way

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Excello Law—five appointments

Excello Law—five appointments

Fee-share firm expands across key practice areas with senior appointments

Irwin Mitchell—Grace Morahan

Irwin Mitchell—Grace Morahan

International divorce team welcomes new hire

Switalskis—14 trainee solicitors

Switalskis—14 trainee solicitors

Firm welcomes largest training cohort in its history

NEWS
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
Charlie Mercer and Astrid Gillam of Stewarts crunch the numbers on civil fraud claims in the English courts, in this week's NLJ. New data shows civil fraud claims rising steadily since 2014, with the King’s Bench Division overtaking the Commercial Court as the forum of choice for lower-value disputes
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve reports on Haynes v Thomson, the first judicial application of the Supreme Court’s For Women Scotland ruling in a discrimination claim, in this week's NLJ
Artificial intelligence may be revolutionising the law, but its misuse could wreck cases and careers, warns Clare Arthurs of Penningtons Manches Cooper in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll