header-logo header-logo

13 June 2014 / Michael L Nash
Issue: 7610 / Categories: Features , EU
printer mail-detail

Friends re-united?

web_eu_friendsreunited_nash

Michael Nash examines the legal conundrum of an independent Scotland’s application to the EU

In February 2014 Jose Manuel Barroso, the outgoing EU Commisssion President, said that “it would be extremely difficult to get the necessary approval of all the EU states for the admission of an independent Scotland”. So far there has not been a definitive statement from Stefan Fule, the Czech diplomat who at present is EU Enlargement Commissioner. The Scottish Government has however noted that no EU state has so far said that it would veto the application of an independent Scotland. So what is the status of Mr Barroso’s remarks?

It is respectfully submitted that this may not be the case at all, it being a situation which has never happened before in the history of the European Union, and its predecessor, the European Community. However, there are a number of examples, the reconfiguration of Germany in 1990 being the prime example, which throw some light upon what is described as a complex situation. This situation, logically argued, may not

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll