header-logo header-logo

Frustration of leases: it’s not all about the pandemic!

18 November 2020 / Anthony Tanney , Catherine Taskis
Issue: 7911 / Categories: Features , Property , Landlord&tenant
printer mail-detail
32368
Anthony Tanney & Catherine Taskis assess some of the broader questions regarding frustration of leases & examine where the law might go next

In brief

  • Almost forty years on, there remains no reported instance of a lease having ever been terminated by frustration.
  • The effects of the supervening event must be sufficiently radical, in order for the contract to be discharged by frustration.

There can be few people who, several months into the current pandemic, are not suffering from some degree of ‘lockdown fatigue’. So we ought to begin by saying that while lockdown is the pretext for this article, the article is not actually about lockdown itself.

First, the pretext. In recent months there has been much discussion about when, if at all, lockdown might cause a lease to be discharged by frustration.

In particular, as everyone knows in National Carriers Ltd v Panaplina Northern Ltd [1981] AC 675, [1981] 1 All ER 161 the House of Lords decided that the contractual

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—19 appointments

DWF—19 appointments

Belfast team bolstered by three senior hires and 16 further appointments

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Firm strengthens leveraged finance team with London partner hire

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Double hire marks launch of family team in Leeds

NEWS
Artificial intelligence may be revolutionising the law, but its misuse could wreck cases and careers, warns Clare Arthurs of Penningtons Manches Cooper in this week's NLJ
Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve reports on Haynes v Thomson, the first judicial application of the Supreme Court’s For Women Scotland ruling in a discrimination claim, in this week's NLJ
Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre makes the case for ‘General Practice Pro Bono’—using core legal skills to deliver life-changing support, without the need for niche expertise—in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll