header-logo header-logo

FSA steps up insider dealing offensive

31 January 2008
Issue: 7306 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Constitutional law , Commercial
printer mail-detail

The Financial Services Authority (FSA) has made the first use of its powers to prosecute two individuals for insider dealing.

 

The Financial Services Authority (FSA) has made the first use of its powers to prosecute two individuals for insider dealing. The two defendants are accused of trading ahead of a proposed cash offer from Motorola Inc for the entire issued share capital of TTP Communications Plc. Both have pleaded not guilty to the charges brought under s 52 of the Criminal Justice Act 1993. Richard Burger, senior solicitor in the regulatory team of Mills and Reeve, says the prosecutions represent another stepchange in the FSA’s strategy to combat market conduct. “To allege that a professional, in this case a solicitor, has committed an act of market misconduct would push the sliding scale very closely towards the criminal standard, in which case you may as well commence criminal prosecutions,”he says. Burger adds that in the FSA’s only other market misconduct prosecution— FSA v Rigby and Bailey—a precedent had been set for harsh sentences for those that abuse the financial markets, and that the imposition of a sentence will provide a more effective deterrent than penalty fines.

 

Issue: 7306 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Constitutional law , Commercial
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

WSP Solicitors—Amie Williamson

WSP Solicitors—Amie Williamson

Gloucestershire firm boosts residential conveyancing team

mfg Solicitors—Andrew Johnson

mfg Solicitors—Andrew Johnson

Firm strengthens corporate team in Worcester with new hire

London Market FOIL—Ling Ong

London Market FOIL—Ling Ong

Weightmans partner appointed president of London Market Forum of Insurance Lawyers

NEWS
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
The long-awaited Getty Images v Stability AI judgment arrived at the end of last year—but not with the seismic impact many expected. In this week's issue of NLJ, experts from Arnold & Porter dissect a ruling that is ‘historic’ yet tightly confined
The UK Supreme Court may be deciding fewer cases, but its impact in 2025 was anything but muted. In this week's NLJ, Professor Emeritus Brice Dickson of Queen’s University Belfast reviews a year marked by historically low output, a striking rise in jointly authored judgments, and a continued decline in dissent. High-profile rulings on biological sex under the Equality Act, public access to Dartmoor, and fairness in sexual offence trials ensured the court’s voice carried far beyond the Strand
back-to-top-scroll