header-logo header-logo

25 September 2008 / David Greene
Issue: 7338 / Categories: Opinion , Costs
printer mail-detail

The funding fallacy

Deficits in civil court funding will have a devastating impact, says David Greene

The letter recently sent by Lord Justice Leveson, the senior presiding judge for England and Wales, to 2,000 judges and 28,000 magistrates warning of the cost consequences of a shortfall in income for the courts, highlights once again the funding fallacy that lies at the heart of the problems the civil courts face.

Leveson LJ appears to have been addressing himself largely to the criminal justice process, but any squeeze there will have an immediate effect on civil justice, given the priorities of the former. The letter comes at a time when despite the best efforts of all involved, practitioners are reporting increasing problems in county courts. It had been hoped that the new partnership agreement between the judiciary and the courts service for running the courts and protecting their budget was going to assist in resolving some perceived problems. The judiciary achieved a greater part in running the courts and “transparency”

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Restructuring and insolvency practice strengthened by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

North West residential development team welcomes partner and associate

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Family law boutique expands London team with legal director hire

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
back-to-top-scroll