header-logo header-logo

25 September 2008 / David Greene
Issue: 7338 / Categories: Opinion , Costs
printer mail-detail

The funding fallacy

Deficits in civil court funding will have a devastating impact, says David Greene

The letter recently sent by Lord Justice Leveson, the senior presiding judge for England and Wales, to 2,000 judges and 28,000 magistrates warning of the cost consequences of a shortfall in income for the courts, highlights once again the funding fallacy that lies at the heart of the problems the civil courts face.

Leveson LJ appears to have been addressing himself largely to the criminal justice process, but any squeeze there will have an immediate effect on civil justice, given the priorities of the former. The letter comes at a time when despite the best efforts of all involved, practitioners are reporting increasing problems in county courts. It had been hoped that the new partnership agreement between the judiciary and the courts service for running the courts and protecting their budget was going to assist in resolving some perceived problems. The judiciary achieved a greater part in running the courts and “transparency”

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll