header-logo header-logo

22 July 2026
Issue: 8171 / Categories: Legal News , Collective action , Litigation funding , Competition
printer mail-detail

Funding for opt-out claims under consultation

Damages-based agreements (DBAs), also known as contingency fees, could be allowed for opt-out collective actions in the Competition Appeal Tribunal

The government consultation, ‘Swifter and simpler competition redress, regulatory appeals and competition enforcement’, launched last week and due to close on 25 September, aims to make opt-out collective actions faster and easier. It builds on responses to a call for evidence last autumn.

The government noted feedback that the current reliance on litigation funders makes the regime ‘vulnerable’, particularly in light of the PACCAR litigation, which created ambiguity about the enforceability of litigation funding agreements. It stated: ‘An increase in options for funding claims could increase competition and therefore drive down the cost of litigation finance, mitigating the risk of a justice gap and increasing the resilience of the regime.’

Other proposals include costs sanctions for unreasonable behaviour and delivery of the funder’s return at an earlier stage in the proceedings. 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll