header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

Funding justice, not failure

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
12 September 2025 / Geoff Dover
Issue: 8130 / Categories: Features , Profession , Litigation funding
printer mail-detail
Litigation funding must be ethical, transparent & aligned with the interests of those it is meant to serve: Geoff Dover sets out a better way forward
  • Recent high-profile law firm collapses have exposed structural and ethical failings in legal funding and litigation finance.
  • Law firms and funders must adopt transparent, aligned and sustainable funding models to rebuild trust.

The collapse of more than 15 consumer claims law firms in the past five years, including SSB Law and Pure Legal, has sent shockwaves through the sector. With over £400m in unpaid debts left in their wake, the damage has been financial, reputational and systemic. While litigation funding is under scrutiny—this summer’s Civil Justice Council working party report and its recommendations for tighter rules and Financial Conduct Authority registration for funders being the latest attempt to set a better path—the more pressing issue lies in the operational failures and incentives that led to such collapses.

To suggest that legal finance is inherently problematic would be a mistake. Funding remains a vital component

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Head of corporate promoted to director

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Firm strengthens international arbitration team with key London hire

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

FCA contentious financial regulation lawyer joins the team as of counsel

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Making Big Tech pay for digital addiction
Social media giants should face tortious liability for the psychological harms their platforms inflict, argues Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers in this week’s NLJ
NLJ this week: Leaseholders stuck in limbo
The Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024—once heralded as a breakthrough—has instead plunged leaseholders into confusion, warns Shabnam Ali-Khan of Russell-Cooke in this week’s NLJ
NLJ this week: When a trial period becomes a ‘reasonable adjustment’
The Employment Appeal Tribunal has now confirmed that offering a disabled employee a trial period in an alternative role can itself be a 'reasonable adjustment' under the Equality Act 2010: in this week's NLJ, Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve analyses the evolving case law
NLJ this week: Ignore covenants at your peril
Caroline Shea KC and Richard Miller of Falcon Chambers examine the growing judicial focus on 'cynical breach' in restrictive covenant cases, in this week's issue of NLJ
NLJ this week: Courts caught in a ‘hierarchy of privacy’
Ian Gascoigne of LexisNexis dissects the uneasy balance between open justice and confidentiality in England’s civil courts, in this week's NLJ. From public hearings to super-injunctions, he identifies five tiers of privacy—from fully open proceedings to entirely secret ones—showing how a patchwork of exceptions has evolved without clear design
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll