header-logo header-logo

Fury after duty solicitor pinned down by security guards

08 May 2024
Issue: 8070 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Criminal lawyers have threatened to boycott Stratford Magistrates’ Court after court security guards pinned a duty solicitor to the floor

The duty solicitor, Dele Johnson, had been working in the youth court on 1 May, when the incident occurred. London Criminal Courts Solicitors Association (LCCSA) has called for the court security guards involved to be suspended pending investigation.

In an open letter to HM Courts and Tribunal Services (HMCTS), Edward Jones, LCCSA president, noted the solicitor was injured and ‘police officers present in the building were called upon to intervene’.

Jones said: ‘Based on the reports we have received, we are seriously concerned and appalled at the alleged behaviour of the security officers involved.

‘Given the seriousness of the alleged incident and the already documented history of complaints against security staff at Stratford Magistrates’ Court (which are already the subject of an official complaint by this association), we have no confidence at the moment that those tasked with ensuring the safety of our members and colleagues at this court are capable of doing so. We therefore demand the immediate suspension from duty of all the security officers involved in the incident pending a full, independent investigation into the facts.

‘Should these security officers continue to work at this court, we may recommend to our members that they do not attend Stratford Magistrates’ Court until this situation has been resolved.’

LCCSA recently made an official complaint about ‘invasive searches’ of solicitors at the same court. In an open letter to HMCTS in April, it said it had been receiving ‘extremely concerning’ reports of ‘over-zealous’ searches, including a pat-down search of a female duty solicitor who, after referring to one of the guards as an ‘idiot’ during the search, was forcibly ejected, had her lunch thrown on the pavement and was denied re-entry.

A spokesperson for HMCTS said: ‘These are serious complaints and we are urgently investigating them as a matter of priority. It would be inappropriate to comment further at this stage. Our security measures are designed to protect the safety of all court users within our premises and remain under constant review.’

Issue: 8070 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Head of corporate promoted to director

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Firm strengthens international arbitration team with key London hire

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

FCA contentious financial regulation lawyer joins the team as of counsel

NEWS
Social media giants should face tortious liability for the psychological harms their platforms inflict, argues Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers in this week’s NLJ
The Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024—once heralded as a breakthrough—has instead plunged leaseholders into confusion, warns Shabnam Ali-Khan of Russell-Cooke in this week’s NLJ
The Employment Appeal Tribunal has now confirmed that offering a disabled employee a trial period in an alternative role can itself be a 'reasonable adjustment' under the Equality Act 2010: in this week's NLJ, Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve analyses the evolving case law
Caroline Shea KC and Richard Miller of Falcon Chambers examine the growing judicial focus on 'cynical breach' in restrictive covenant cases, in this week's issue of NLJ
Ian Gascoigne of LexisNexis dissects the uneasy balance between open justice and confidentiality in England’s civil courts, in this week's NLJ. From public hearings to super-injunctions, he identifies five tiers of privacy—from fully open proceedings to entirely secret ones—showing how a patchwork of exceptions has evolved without clear design
back-to-top-scroll