header-logo header-logo

24 July 2008
Issue: 7331 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Future claims need not be a sprint

Legal news update

Disgraced sprinter Dwain Chambers could still run in the London 2012 Olympic Games after a judge failed to rule on the disputed lawfulness of a British Olympic Association (BOA) byelaw, say experts.

Mr Justice MacKay refused to grant a temporary injunction allowing Chambers to run in the forthcoming Beijing games. He said that Chambers had failed to prove that his ban under BOA byelaw 25, banning athletes from representing the UK after a positive drugs test, was a restraint of trade and contrary to European and domestic competition law. In addition, he found that Chambers had delayed too long in seeking relief following his return to athletics in 2006.

Employment law special - ist, Niran De Silva of Littleton Chambers, says, “As the judge did not rule on the lawfulness of the byelaw itself, it remains possible that in a different case, brought in good time, the byelaw could be overturned.” He adds that it remains possible that Chambers may pursue the matter to the full trial listed in March 2009.

De Silva continues: “The judgment is certainly a warning to sportsmen and women to act promptly if they wish to challenge the lawfulness of BOA byelaws, rather than wait until the relevant sporting standard has been met before issuing proceedings.”

Issue: 7331 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll