header-logo header-logo

Game over

11 April 2014 / Siobhan Jones
Issue: 7602 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail
web_jones_0

Administrators of insolvent tenants are under a duty to pay rent owed to landlords, says Siobhan Jones

On 24 February 2014, the Court of Appeal delivered their unanimous judgment in the long awaited appeal in Pillar Denton Ltd and Ors v Jervis & Ors [2014] EWCA Civ 180 (Game). The decision has clarified the obligations on the part of administrators of insolvent tenants to pay rent to a landlord where tenant companies go into administration.

Insolvent corporate tenants

These issues have been taxing landlords and administrators alike. The principles as to how rent falls to be treated in these circumstances were considered extensively, and settled, in the cases of Goldacre (Offices) Ltd v Nortel Networks UK Ltd [2010] Ch 455 (Goldacre) and Leisure Norwich (II) and others v Luminar Lava Ignite Ltd (in administration) and others [2012] EWHC 951 (Ch) (Luminar).

In short, an administrator was not liable to pay rent (in advance) which fell due prior to the date of administration, even if the administrator subsequently

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Head of corporate promoted to director

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Firm strengthens international arbitration team with key London hire

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

FCA contentious financial regulation lawyer joins the team as of counsel

NEWS
Social media giants should face tortious liability for the psychological harms their platforms inflict, argues Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers in this week’s NLJ
The Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024—once heralded as a breakthrough—has instead plunged leaseholders into confusion, warns Shabnam Ali-Khan of Russell-Cooke in this week’s NLJ
The Employment Appeal Tribunal has now confirmed that offering a disabled employee a trial period in an alternative role can itself be a 'reasonable adjustment' under the Equality Act 2010: in this week's NLJ, Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve analyses the evolving case law
Caroline Shea KC and Richard Miller of Falcon Chambers examine the growing judicial focus on 'cynical breach' in restrictive covenant cases, in this week's issue of NLJ
Ian Gascoigne of LexisNexis dissects the uneasy balance between open justice and confidentiality in England’s civil courts, in this week's NLJ. From public hearings to super-injunctions, he identifies five tiers of privacy—from fully open proceedings to entirely secret ones—showing how a patchwork of exceptions has evolved without clear design
back-to-top-scroll