header-logo header-logo

11 April 2014 / Siobhan Jones
Issue: 7602 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Game over

web_jones_0

Administrators of insolvent tenants are under a duty to pay rent owed to landlords, says Siobhan Jones

On 24 February 2014, the Court of Appeal delivered their unanimous judgment in the long awaited appeal in Pillar Denton Ltd and Ors v Jervis & Ors [2014] EWCA Civ 180 (Game). The decision has clarified the obligations on the part of administrators of insolvent tenants to pay rent to a landlord where tenant companies go into administration.

Insolvent corporate tenants

These issues have been taxing landlords and administrators alike. The principles as to how rent falls to be treated in these circumstances were considered extensively, and settled, in the cases of Goldacre (Offices) Ltd v Nortel Networks UK Ltd [2010] Ch 455 (Goldacre) and Leisure Norwich (II) and others v Luminar Lava Ignite Ltd (in administration) and others [2012] EWHC 951 (Ch) (Luminar).

In short, an administrator was not liable to pay rent (in advance) which fell due prior to the date of administration, even if the administrator subsequently

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll