header-logo header-logo

A game of risk

13 May 2015
Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs , Jackson
printer mail-detail

Philip Evangelou considers the counter-party risk for firms acting on a CFA, & the impact that insufficient ATE & recoverability can have on the CFA relationship

Frederick B Wilcox once said: “Progress always involves risks. You can't steal second base and keep your foot on first.” 

The popularity of conditional fee agreements (CFA) in commercial litigation is growing as UK firms are ever-more tuned into its ability to aid the acquisition of new clients. However, there are some basic lessons that firms need to adhere to ensure the CFA works for lawyer and client alike. 

Credit worthiness

The first test that should be considered is the credit worthiness of the defendant. As some of the fees are usually paid by the client, an estimate of their share of the costs should be made clear at the outset.

Conducting searches of a defendant’s net assets is a preliminary step that ought to be conducted before entertaining a CFA. The preferable asset class is real estate

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll