header-logo header-logo

A game of risk

13 May 2015
Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs , Jackson
printer mail-detail

Philip Evangelou considers the counter-party risk for firms acting on a CFA, & the impact that insufficient ATE & recoverability can have on the CFA relationship

Frederick B Wilcox once said: “Progress always involves risks. You can't steal second base and keep your foot on first.” 

The popularity of conditional fee agreements (CFA) in commercial litigation is growing as UK firms are ever-more tuned into its ability to aid the acquisition of new clients. However, there are some basic lessons that firms need to adhere to ensure the CFA works for lawyer and client alike. 

Credit worthiness

The first test that should be considered is the credit worthiness of the defendant. As some of the fees are usually paid by the client, an estimate of their share of the costs should be made clear at the outset.

Conducting searches of a defendant’s net assets is a preliminary step that ought to be conducted before entertaining a CFA. The preferable asset class is real estate

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll