header-logo header-logo

13 January 2025
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail

Gateley Legal—Martin Thomas

Real estate litigation partner appointed in London

Gateley Legal has bolstered its specialist real estate dispute resolution team in London with the appointment of new partner, Martin Thomas.

Solicitor, advocate and qualified mediator, Thomas, joins Gateley Legal following 12 years at Gowling WLG where he formerly headed up the real estate disputes team. Prior to that, he was a partner and head of the real estate disputes team at Herbert Smith (now known as Herbert Smith Freehills). In total, he brings 35 years of experience of disputes across the real estate sector including an expansive range of commercial landlord and tenant matters and development issues, as well as contract, negligence, finance and insolvency, housebuilder and cladding disputes.

He also specialises in telecoms, including cases in the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court following the introduction of the Electronic Communications Code in 2017. Thomas is experienced in negotiating and renewing telecoms agreements between site operators and providers, as well as any litigation issues around access and the termination of old sites.

At Gateley Legal, Thomas will work closely alongside the property and construction legal professionals and consultancy experts within the wider Group to provide full-service solutions for clients. This includes Gateley Hamer who specialise in telecoms infrastructure matters.

On his appointment, Thomas said: 'It’s an exciting time to be joining Gateley Legal to support with developing the multi-disciplinary property and construction offering in London. I’m looking forward to working alongside the consultancy professionals, and some familiar legal peers, to deliver forward thinking solutions for clients.'

Dawn Reynolds, partner and national head of real estate dispute resolution at Gateley Legal (pictured, left), said: 'We’re really pleased to have Martin onboard with us as he brings valuable litigation experience to supplement the comprehensive service we provide to our real estate, housebuilder and developer clients. His appointment also enhances our telecoms offering which now comprises legal transactional and litigation work combined with surveying for a full-service solution. His expertise will also be a great asset for our housebuilder, institutional investors and large property company clients.'

Based in offices in Birmingham, Manchester and London, Gateley Legal’s real estate dispute resolution team works with property owners, corporate occupiers, developers, investors and management companies on a wide range of property-related dispute matters.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers to be joined by leading family law set, 4 Brick Court, this summer

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Real estate and construction energy offering boosted by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Firm bolsters real estate team with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS
A wave of housing and procedural reforms is set to test the limits of tribunal capacity. In his latest Civil Way column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold charts sweeping change as the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 begins biting
Plans to reduce jury trials risk missing the real problem in the criminal justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, David Wolchover of Ridgeway Chambers argues the crown court backlog is fuelled not by juries but weak cases slipping through a flawed ‘50%’ prosecution test
Emerging technologies may soon transform how courts determine truth in deeply personal disputes. In this week's NLJ, Madhavi Kabra of 1 Hare Court and Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers explore how neurotechnology could reshape family law
A controversial protest case has reignited debate over the limits of free expression. In NLJ this week, Nicholas Dobson examines a Quran-burning incident testing public order law
The courts have drawn a firm line under attempts to extend arbitration appeals. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed of the University of Leicester highlights that if the High Court refuses permission under s 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996, that is the end
back-to-top-scroll