header-logo header-logo

GDPR fuels cybersecurity fears

03 May 2018
Issue: 7791 / Categories: Legal News , Data protection
printer mail-detail
nlj_7791_news

Businesses that suffer a cybersecurity attack after the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) comes into force could face huge fines as well as increased reputational damage and potential compensation claims.

The GDPR, which takes effect on 25 May, ushers in strict controls on the use of personal data in the UK. As organisations scramble to ensure their processes are compliant and employees are trained, concern is mounting about the GDPR’s impact on cybersecurity.

For example, TalkTalk was fined £400,000 in 2016 and £100,000 in 2017 after suffering cybersecurity attacks that led to data protection breaches. Although the maximum fine under the Data Protection Act is £0.5m, however, this will rise under the GDPR to €10m or 2% of annual worldwide turnover (whichever is highest) for breaches of data protection obligations, and €20m or 4% of worldwide turnover for breaches of data subjects’ rights and freedoms.

‘We won’t know the full consequences of an attack under the GDPR regime until it happens,’ said Jon Szehofner, partner, Gordon Dadds Financial Markets.

‘However, we do know that the fines could potentially be far more significant and the consequences much greater, and this concern is driving board-level support for investment in compliance. There is also greater potential reputational risk because the GDPR is making people realise the value of their own data.

‘Another issue is that the GDPR gives people rights to redress for misuse of data. Consequently, there has been speculation in some quarters that claims management companies may encourage people to pursue compensation.’

With less than three weeks to go, organisations should make sure they at least know where the gaps and risks are in their systems and focus on what is important to comply with the spirit of the GDPR, Szehofner said.

‘There is a lot of interpretation involved in implementation, and many grey areas. It is principles-based rather than rules-based. Global banks are generally comfortable with that as it’s the type of regulatory system they’re used to, but smaller businesses may find it more difficult.’

Szehofner, who advises global financial institutions, says the first hurdle any organisation needs to clear is ‘understanding the scope of the GDPR as it pertains to their business’.

‘They need to look through the specific lens of their business because a generic response won’t work.’

Issue: 7791 / Categories: Legal News , Data protection
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll