header-logo header-logo

GDPR: a weapon of mass disruption?

20 April 2018 / Mette Marie Sutton , Patrick Wheeler
Issue: 7789 / Categories: Features , Data protection
printer mail-detail
nlj_7789_wheeler

Patrick Wheeler & Mette Marie Sutton explain how increased data subject access rights could wreak havoc

  • A co-ordinated set of requests by a large number of individuals made at the same time could be time consuming, expensive & cause huge disruption.

Most businesses should be aware that EU data protection law is changing as a result of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which comes into force in the UK (and across the EU) on 25 May 2018.

GDPR builds on the previous Data Protection Regulation by giving individuals greater power to access and exercise control over their personal data: one example of this are the new rules regarding data subject access requests (DSARs). However, there is concern that the changes to DSARs could encourage individuals to use them as a weapon against businesses processing their personal data. So what exactly is the threat and how can a business manage the associated risks?

GDPR establishes sets of obligations and rights. The obligations include processing personal data lawfully, fairly and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll