header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
20 April 2018 / Mette Marie Sutton , Patrick Wheeler
Issue: 7789 / Categories: Features , Data protection
printer mail-detail

GDPR: a weapon of mass disruption?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
nlj_7789_wheeler

Patrick Wheeler & Mette Marie Sutton explain how increased data subject access rights could wreak havoc

  • A co-ordinated set of requests by a large number of individuals made at the same time could be time consuming, expensive & cause huge disruption.

Most businesses should be aware that EU data protection law is changing as a result of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which comes into force in the UK (and across the EU) on 25 May 2018.

GDPR builds on the previous Data Protection Regulation by giving individuals greater power to access and exercise control over their personal data: one example of this are the new rules regarding data subject access requests (DSARs). However, there is concern that the changes to DSARs could encourage individuals to use them as a weapon against businesses processing their personal data. So what exactly is the threat and how can a business manage the associated risks?

GDPR establishes sets of obligations and rights. The obligations include processing personal data lawfully, fairly and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Finding innovative ways to fund the justice gap
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Policing the safeguards when appointing trust corporations
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
NLJ this week: What the court considers when assessing refusal of ADR
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
NLJ this week: Where would we be without limitation?
In this week’s NLJ, Fred Philpott, Gough Square Chambers, invites us to imagine there was no statutory limitation. What would that world be like?
NLJ this week: Two’s company, but three’s a crowd in financial provision cases
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll