header-logo header-logo

09 January 2020 / Claire Christopholus
Issue: 7869 / Categories: Features , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Getting away with murder?

13682
Irrelevant details about a victim’s sexual history are not a defence to murder or assault, says Claire Christopholus

The recent press coverage of British backpacker Grace Millane’s murder trial has served as a shocking reminder of the prejudicial treatment of young women, and the unwillingness of the media and the public to distinguish between consensual ‘rough sex’ and sexual violence. Grace (whose parents are pictured above) was 21 years old, travelling alone in New Zealand, when she was strangled to death on a first date. Her killer, whose name is subject to a court ‘suppression’ order, subsequently photographed her naked, before bundling her body into a suitcase and burying her in a forest. His defence was that they had engaged in rough sex, including choking, and Grace (pictured below) had died accidentally.

‘Friends of Grace Millane give evidence about her BDSM [bondage, domination and sadomasochism] interests’; ‘She asked him to choke her during sex’; ‘Grace Millane used a safe word whilst practising BDSM’; ‘Strangled tourist liked being choked’. These are just some

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll