header-logo header-logo

19 September 2025 / David Bailey-Vella
Issue: 8131 / Categories: Features , Profession , Costs
printer mail-detail

Getting back to basics on costs

David Bailey-Vella breaks down the costs budgeting light pilot
  • The costs budgeting light pilot sets out to streamline the costs management process for lower-value multi-track claims.
  • It presents a step towards a permanent overhaul of the costs budgeting framework for lower-value claims.

In a significant step toward modernising civil litigation in England and Wales, the 179th amendment of the CPR introduced the costs budgeting light pilot scheme, also known as simplified costs budgeting.

Launched on 6 April 2025, this three-year pilot aims to streamline the costs management process for lower-value multi-track claims, reducing complexity and promoting proportionality in legal proceedings. For those practitioners engaging with the pilot, it is important to explore and understand the scope, structure, strategic implications, and practical next steps.

The pilot applies to Part 7 multi-track claims and is mandatory for eligible cases issued between 1 April 2025 and 1 April 2028, unless the court directs otherwise, with a value of less than £1m. The scheme is currently being trialled in the business

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll