header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
19 September 2025 / David Bailey-Vella
Issue: 8131 / Categories: Features , Profession , Costs
printer mail-detail

Getting back to basics on costs

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
David Bailey-Vella breaks down the costs budgeting light pilot
  • The costs budgeting light pilot sets out to streamline the costs management process for lower-value multi-track claims.
  • It presents a step towards a permanent overhaul of the costs budgeting framework for lower-value claims.

In a significant step toward modernising civil litigation in England and Wales, the 179th amendment of the CPR introduced the costs budgeting light pilot scheme, also known as simplified costs budgeting.

Launched on 6 April 2025, this three-year pilot aims to streamline the costs management process for lower-value multi-track claims, reducing complexity and promoting proportionality in legal proceedings. For those practitioners engaging with the pilot, it is important to explore and understand the scope, structure, strategic implications, and practical next steps.

The pilot applies to Part 7 multi-track claims and is mandatory for eligible cases issued between 1 April 2025 and 1 April 2028, unless the court directs otherwise, with a value of less than £1m. The scheme is currently being trialled in the business

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll