header-logo header-logo

01 October 2012 / Dr Chris Pamplin
Issue: 7531 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness
printer mail-detail

Getting in line

Chris Pamplin considers revised guidance for expert witnesses & those who instruct them

In 2005 the Civil Justice Council (CJC) published guidance on instructing experts to give evidence in civil claims, and this is now annexed to Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) Practice Direction (PD) 35.

Although the guidance was updated in 2009, there have been no significant changes since its inception.

However, in July 2012, a CJC working party published revised guidance for the instruction of experts (see http://www.jspubs.com/Experts/library/lib_eridx.cfm).

It is designed, say its authors, to help litigants, instructing solicitors and expert witnesses to understand best practice in meeting the requirements of the CPR.

The CJC expects that this revised version will replace the Experts’ Protocol currently appended to PD35. However, before it comes into force, it needs to be reviewed and approved by the Civil Procedure Rules Committee - such matters are seldom swiftly done.

Although the substance of the guidance is not radically different from the 2005 version, there are some subtle changes and one or two quite significant ones.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll