header-logo header-logo

01 October 2012 / Dr Chris Pamplin
Issue: 7531 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness
printer mail-detail

Getting in line

Chris Pamplin considers revised guidance for expert witnesses & those who instruct them

In 2005 the Civil Justice Council (CJC) published guidance on instructing experts to give evidence in civil claims, and this is now annexed to Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) Practice Direction (PD) 35.

Although the guidance was updated in 2009, there have been no significant changes since its inception.

However, in July 2012, a CJC working party published revised guidance for the instruction of experts (see http://www.jspubs.com/Experts/library/lib_eridx.cfm).

It is designed, say its authors, to help litigants, instructing solicitors and expert witnesses to understand best practice in meeting the requirements of the CPR.

The CJC expects that this revised version will replace the Experts’ Protocol currently appended to PD35. However, before it comes into force, it needs to be reviewed and approved by the Civil Procedure Rules Committee - such matters are seldom swiftly done.

Although the substance of the guidance is not radically different from the 2005 version, there are some subtle changes and one or two quite significant ones.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll