header-logo header-logo

01 October 2012 / Dr Chris Pamplin
Issue: 7531 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness
printer mail-detail

Getting in line

Chris Pamplin considers revised guidance for expert witnesses & those who instruct them

In 2005 the Civil Justice Council (CJC) published guidance on instructing experts to give evidence in civil claims, and this is now annexed to Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) Practice Direction (PD) 35.

Although the guidance was updated in 2009, there have been no significant changes since its inception.

However, in July 2012, a CJC working party published revised guidance for the instruction of experts (see http://www.jspubs.com/Experts/library/lib_eridx.cfm).

It is designed, say its authors, to help litigants, instructing solicitors and expert witnesses to understand best practice in meeting the requirements of the CPR.

The CJC expects that this revised version will replace the Experts’ Protocol currently appended to PD35. However, before it comes into force, it needs to be reviewed and approved by the Civil Procedure Rules Committee - such matters are seldom swiftly done.

Although the substance of the guidance is not radically different from the 2005 version, there are some subtle changes and one or two quite significant ones.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Firm welcomes partner with specialist expertise in family and art law

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Dual-qualified partner joins international private client team

NEWS
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

back-to-top-scroll