header-logo header-logo

01 October 2012 / Dr Chris Pamplin
Issue: 7531 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness
printer mail-detail

Getting in line

Chris Pamplin considers revised guidance for expert witnesses & those who instruct them

In 2005 the Civil Justice Council (CJC) published guidance on instructing experts to give evidence in civil claims, and this is now annexed to Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) Practice Direction (PD) 35.

Although the guidance was updated in 2009, there have been no significant changes since its inception.

However, in July 2012, a CJC working party published revised guidance for the instruction of experts (see http://www.jspubs.com/Experts/library/lib_eridx.cfm).

It is designed, say its authors, to help litigants, instructing solicitors and expert witnesses to understand best practice in meeting the requirements of the CPR.

The CJC expects that this revised version will replace the Experts’ Protocol currently appended to PD35. However, before it comes into force, it needs to be reviewed and approved by the Civil Procedure Rules Committee - such matters are seldom swiftly done.

Although the substance of the guidance is not radically different from the 2005 version, there are some subtle changes and one or two quite significant ones.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll