header-logo header-logo

29 November 2007 / Karen Harrison , Nicholas Ryder
Issue: 7299 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Getting tough on fraud

Dr Karen Harrison and Dr Nicholas Ryder look at sentencing and the Fraud Act 2006

The law relating to fraud mainly comprises eight statutory deception offences in the Theft Acts (1968 to 1996) and the common law offence of conspiracy to defraud. The statutory offences are specific and overlapping, yet are not related to each other to cover the variety of fraudulent behaviour in an organised way. It is not always clear which offence should be charged, and defendants have successfully argued that the consequences of their particular deceptive behaviour did not fall within the definition of the offence with which they had been charged. See, for example, R v Preddy, R v Slade [1996] UKHL 13, [1996] 3 All ER 481.

In 1999, the Law Commission issued a consultation paper, Legislating the Criminal Code: Fraud and Deception, and published a final report in 2002 along with the Fraud Bill. The Fraud Act 2006 (FrA 2006) received Royal Assent on 8 November 2006. It overhauled and widened the array of criminal offences available

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll