header-logo header-logo

29 November 2007 / Karen Harrison , Nicholas Ryder
Issue: 7299 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Getting tough on fraud

Dr Karen Harrison and Dr Nicholas Ryder look at sentencing and the Fraud Act 2006

The law relating to fraud mainly comprises eight statutory deception offences in the Theft Acts (1968 to 1996) and the common law offence of conspiracy to defraud. The statutory offences are specific and overlapping, yet are not related to each other to cover the variety of fraudulent behaviour in an organised way. It is not always clear which offence should be charged, and defendants have successfully argued that the consequences of their particular deceptive behaviour did not fall within the definition of the offence with which they had been charged. See, for example, R v Preddy, R v Slade [1996] UKHL 13, [1996] 3 All ER 481.

In 1999, the Law Commission issued a consultation paper, Legislating the Criminal Code: Fraud and Deception, and published a final report in 2002 along with the Fraud Bill. The Fraud Act 2006 (FrA 2006) received Royal Assent on 8 November 2006. It overhauled and widened the array of criminal offences available

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll