header-logo header-logo

17 December 2025
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail

Gibson Dunn—London partner promotions

Firm grows international bench with expanded UK partner class

Gibson Dunn has unveiled the largest partner class in its history, with 42 lawyers promoted worldwide and a record cohort in London. Chair and managing partner Barbara Becker (pictured) praised the group’s contribution to the firm’s culture and client work, highlighting their ‘remarkable work’ and saying the firm is ‘thrilled to welcome them’ to the partnership.

The London office accounts for more than a quarter of all promotions, reflecting sustained investment in the firm’s UK platform. New London partners span antitrust, tax, litigation, real estate, transportation and space, private equity, and restructuring. The promotions include Valeri Bozhikov (antitrust and competition), James Chandler (tax), Jonathan Griffin (litigation), Graham Haselgrove (real estate), Tom Jackson (transportation and space), Osvaldo Galeano (M&A), Mark Leverkus (transportation and space), Claire Shepherd (antitrust and competition), Michael S. Skouras (private equity), Matthew Squire (business restructuring and reorganisation), and Alana Tinkler (antitrust and competition).

These new partners advise on some of the UK market’s most complex mandates, from cross-border financings and restructurings to multi-jurisdictional merger control, strategic M&A, and high-stakes investigations and litigation. Their practices support core areas of client demand across financial sponsors, corporates, technology companies, infrastructure investors, and global institutions.

The strengthened UK bench underscores the firm’s broader international growth, with 40% of the global class based outside the US. The London appointments reflect a continued strategic focus on expanding capacity in key regulatory, transactional and disputes capabilities, aligning with growing client needs across the UK and Europe.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll