header-logo header-logo

05 May 2021
Issue: 7931 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Legal aid focus , Family
printer mail-detail

Give domestic abuse victims legal aid

Gaps in provision remain as Domestic Violence Bill clears final hurdle

Lawyers have called for non-means tested legal aid to be made available to domestic abuse victims, as the Domestic Violence Bill passed its final parliamentary hurdle.

The Bill, approved by the House of Lords last week, defines domestic violence to include coercive or controlling behaviour and creates greater protection for victims.

It places a duty on local authorities to provide victims with support and accommodation, and introduces Domestic Abuse Protection Notices and Domestic Abuse Protection Orders to provide immediate protection for victims and in situations where there is insufficient evidence to charge the perpetrator. It also prevents perpetrators from cross-examining their victims in court.

Law Society president I Stephanie Boyce welcomed the extra provisions for victims, particularly given the rise in abuse during the COVID-19 pandemic.

‘This is why we believe that the criteria for legal aid should be urgently revised to ensure that victims of domestic abuse can access legal advice without having their means assessed,’ she said.

Boyce also warned that some of the Bill’s measures fall short of what was required, for example, ‘alleged abusers should also be banned from examining some other witnesses―the couple’s children being the prime example―in court’.

Bar Council chair Derek Sweeting QC said: ‘It is disappointing that the government has ignored our call to make non-means tested legal aid available in all domestic abuse cases… legal representation ought to be a given for these difficult and traumatic cases.’

Vanessa Friend, partner at Hodge Jones & Allen, said: ‘Although the Lords had proposed amendments around the monitoring of stalkers and abusers, which were rejected by the government, they ultimately wanted the bill to be passed and recognised the value in doing so.’

Friend said there were gaps in provision for the 2.4 million victims of domestic abuse each year, including the failure to protect migrants who have no recourse to public funds.

Issue: 7931 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Legal aid focus , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll