header-logo header-logo

Giving young people a voice

09 June 2011
Issue: 7469 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Children to have a say in proposed reforms to family justice system

The independent panel set up to review the family justice system has launched a Young People’s Guide to encourage children and young people to comment on the proposed reforms.

The guide, published last week, aims to explain the proposed reforms in language young people can understand. It has been drawn up by Roger Morgan, the children’s rights director for England, and covers the proposals put forward by the family justice review panel, chaired by David Norgrove.

Norgrove says: “Children are the most important people in the family justice system and it is vital that they have a voice in shaping its future.

“The publication of the Young Person’s Guide gives them this opportunity and the panel will carefully consider what they say.”

The Norgrove review, which will make its final recommendations in the autumn, has highlighted “scandalous” delays in the justice system, with children living with foster parents and in children’s homes for months and years while the courts resolve their future. It can take a year or longer for a baby to be placed with adoptive parents, and the average child care case took 53 weeks in 2010.

The review panel has proposed introducing into legislation a six-month time limit for completion of care proceedings. It called for greater judicial continuity in cases to enable the judge to exercise firmer case management, and so that children and parents appear before the same judge at each stage in the proceedings.

It noted a lack of communications between different agencies and criticised “the current unsatisfactory IT systems” used in family cases. It recommended simplifying the court structure by creating a single family court, with a single point of entry, in place of the current three tiers of court, and creating a family justice board to oversee the system.
Morgan wants children to have a voice in the decisions made about their future.

“I spend a lot of time listening to what young people have to say about how they are looked after and reporting these messages to government,” he says. “It is essential that children and young people are told about proposals that will directly affect them.”

Alan Bean, co-chairman of the association of lawyers for children, says: “We draw a distinction between a vox pop or snapshot survey and serious academic research on which policy can be based. It is interesting to hear the views of children and young people, but I’m not sure how the review panel intends to interpret the responses it receives, or how they will use them.”

The consultation closes on 23 June.

Issue: 7469 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
back-to-top-scroll