header-logo header-logo

06 February 2015 / Andrew Francis
Issue: 7639 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

A glimmer of light?

francis

Andrew Francis discusses right of light reform proposals

In June 2011 the Law Commission (LC) published a Report and draft Bill (Making Land Work: easements covenants and profits à prendre) (Law Com. No.327) which proposed radical reform of the law in that area. In that report the LC stated that it would undertake a separate project on rights of light in its 11th Programme of reform. This was done and the LC published a consultation paper in February 2013; Law Com. No. 210.

Significantly the report and draft Bill published on 4 December 2014 reflects the decision of the Supreme Court on 26 February 2014 in Lawrence v Fen Tigers [2014] AC 822, [2014] 2 All ER 622.

The key concerns that lie behind consultation paper and the report and Bill which sparked the need for reform may be summarised as follows:

  1. The effect of the decision in HKRUK II (CHC) Ltd v Heaney [2010] EWHC 2245, [2010] All ER (D) 101 (Sep). This increased the risk of an injunction
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll