header-logo header-logo

‘Gloves off’ as first GDPR fine issued

10 July 2019
Issue: 7848 / Categories: Legal News , Data protection
printer mail-detail
Business fears about a tough GDPR regime have been confirmed after the first company to be penalised, British Airways, received a £183.39m fine.

The Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) issued the penalty this week for a data breach that compromised 500,000 BA customers. Businesses have waited since 25 May 2018 to get an idea of the possible size of General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) fines.

BA has said it will make representations to the ICO about the size of the proposed fine and intends to appeal.

David White, commercial and IP associate at Rollits, said the fine ‘demonstrates that the ICO is not afraid to use the weapons at its disposal to hammer home the importance of data protection. 

‘Any organisation that has ignored to its data protection responsibilities, or seen data protection compliance as a “tick-box” exercise, should take stock: the gloves are off.’

The BA fine represents about 1.5% of its annual worldwide turnover. Under the GDPR, organisations can be fined up to 20 million euros or 4% of annual worldwide turnover for a serious breach, whichever is highest, and 10 million euros or 2% of annual worldwide turnover for a less serious breach. This is considerably higher than the maximum £500,000 fines possible under the Data Protection Act.

Raoul Parekh, partner at GQ|Littler, said: ‘The first GDPR fine is the display of shock and awe that many feared.

‘Politicians and pressure groups have been lobbying for heavy penalties and it seems they have listened. The ICO has used its first announcement of intention to fine as a major deterrent to ensure businesses take GDPR extremely seriously.

‘British Airways has acted very responsibly since the breach was discovered, notifying the ICO and co-operating with the regulator to fix the issues and repair the damage. For the ICO, though, businesses need prevention and not just cure if they are to avoid fines.’

Issue: 7848 / Categories: Legal News , Data protection
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll