header-logo header-logo

10 July 2019
Issue: 7848 / Categories: Legal News , Data protection
printer mail-detail

‘Gloves off’ as first GDPR fine issued

Business fears about a tough GDPR regime have been confirmed after the first company to be penalised, British Airways, received a £183.39m fine.

The Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) issued the penalty this week for a data breach that compromised 500,000 BA customers. Businesses have waited since 25 May 2018 to get an idea of the possible size of General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) fines.

BA has said it will make representations to the ICO about the size of the proposed fine and intends to appeal.

David White, commercial and IP associate at Rollits, said the fine ‘demonstrates that the ICO is not afraid to use the weapons at its disposal to hammer home the importance of data protection. 

‘Any organisation that has ignored to its data protection responsibilities, or seen data protection compliance as a “tick-box” exercise, should take stock: the gloves are off.’

The BA fine represents about 1.5% of its annual worldwide turnover. Under the GDPR, organisations can be fined up to 20 million euros or 4% of annual worldwide turnover for a serious breach, whichever is highest, and 10 million euros or 2% of annual worldwide turnover for a less serious breach. This is considerably higher than the maximum £500,000 fines possible under the Data Protection Act.

Raoul Parekh, partner at GQ|Littler, said: ‘The first GDPR fine is the display of shock and awe that many feared.

‘Politicians and pressure groups have been lobbying for heavy penalties and it seems they have listened. The ICO has used its first announcement of intention to fine as a major deterrent to ensure businesses take GDPR extremely seriously.

‘British Airways has acted very responsibly since the breach was discovered, notifying the ICO and co-operating with the regulator to fix the issues and repair the damage. For the ICO, though, businesses need prevention and not just cure if they are to avoid fines.’

Issue: 7848 / Categories: Legal News , Data protection
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll