header-logo header-logo

29 April 2010 / Charlotte Ovans , Tony Lewis
Issue: 7415 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Going global

Tony Lewis & Charlotte Ovans consider the Bribery Act 2010 & a global approach to anti-corruption

Companies need to pay attention to the Bribery Act 2010 (the Act). The Act is particularly notable as it creates a new strict liability corporate criminal offence of failing to prevent bribery. There is a real danger that under the new legislation a company could unwittingly commit the corporate criminal offence as a result of someone on the ground in another country, over whom it has little control, making an irregular payment.

Recent developments

The Act received Royal Assent earlier this month. The main provisions of the Act are expected to come into force later in the year. The Act replaces antiquated law which was complex, and, until recently, rarely enforced.

The new legislation is significant in a number of respects, not least because it includes a new corporate criminal offence of failing to prevent bribery, wherever the bribery takes place in the world.
In broad terms there are four types of offence in the Act which

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll