header-logo header-logo

Going global

29 April 2010 / Charlotte Ovans , Tony Lewis
Issue: 7415 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Tony Lewis & Charlotte Ovans consider the Bribery Act 2010 & a global approach to anti-corruption

Companies need to pay attention to the Bribery Act 2010 (the Act). The Act is particularly notable as it creates a new strict liability corporate criminal offence of failing to prevent bribery. There is a real danger that under the new legislation a company could unwittingly commit the corporate criminal offence as a result of someone on the ground in another country, over whom it has little control, making an irregular payment.

Recent developments

The Act received Royal Assent earlier this month. The main provisions of the Act are expected to come into force later in the year. The Act replaces antiquated law which was complex, and, until recently, rarely enforced.

The new legislation is significant in a number of respects, not least because it includes a new corporate criminal offence of failing to prevent bribery, wherever the bribery takes place in the world.
In broad terms there are four types of offence in the Act which are:
(i) A

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Partner hire bolstersprivate capital and global aviation finance offering

Morae—Carla Mendy

Morae—Carla Mendy

Digital and business solutions firm appoints chief operating officer

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Set welcomes two experienced juniors as new tenants

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll