header-logo header-logo

29 April 2010 / Charlotte Ovans , Tony Lewis
Issue: 7415 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Going global

Tony Lewis & Charlotte Ovans consider the Bribery Act 2010 & a global approach to anti-corruption

Companies need to pay attention to the Bribery Act 2010 (the Act). The Act is particularly notable as it creates a new strict liability corporate criminal offence of failing to prevent bribery. There is a real danger that under the new legislation a company could unwittingly commit the corporate criminal offence as a result of someone on the ground in another country, over whom it has little control, making an irregular payment.

Recent developments

The Act received Royal Assent earlier this month. The main provisions of the Act are expected to come into force later in the year. The Act replaces antiquated law which was complex, and, until recently, rarely enforced.

The new legislation is significant in a number of respects, not least because it includes a new corporate criminal offence of failing to prevent bribery, wherever the bribery takes place in the world.
In broad terms there are four types of offence in the Act which

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll