header-logo header-logo

Going solo

16 January 2015 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7636 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

A recent report illustrates the pressures facing the growing number of litigants in person, says Jon Robins

This is how one litigant in person, an electrician by trade, likened the daunting experience of coming before the family courts without a lawyer. “If I walked into a meter room, I could take the systems apart with my eyes closed. If you walked in there, you wouldn’t know what you were doing,” he explained in a conversation with a researcher in a new study published by the Ministry of Justice. Similarly, he walked into that courtroom and felt “absolutely blind”.

The report (Litigants in person in private family law cases) begins with the words of Lord Woolf, quoted in this column recently, which warned against the lawyers’ tendency to dismiss unrepresented litigants as “a problem for judges and for the court system rather than the person to whom the system of civil justice exists”. The “true problem” was the court system which was “often inaccessible”, the then Lord Chief Justice noted in 1995.

At

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll