header-logo header-logo

16 January 2015 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7636 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Going solo

A recent report illustrates the pressures facing the growing number of litigants in person, says Jon Robins

This is how one litigant in person, an electrician by trade, likened the daunting experience of coming before the family courts without a lawyer. “If I walked into a meter room, I could take the systems apart with my eyes closed. If you walked in there, you wouldn’t know what you were doing,” he explained in a conversation with a researcher in a new study published by the Ministry of Justice. Similarly, he walked into that courtroom and felt “absolutely blind”.

The report (Litigants in person in private family law cases) begins with the words of Lord Woolf, quoted in this column recently, which warned against the lawyers’ tendency to dismiss unrepresented litigants as “a problem for judges and for the court system rather than the person to whom the system of civil justice exists”. The “true problem” was the court system which was “often inaccessible”, the then Lord Chief Justice noted in 1995.

At

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll