header-logo header-logo

28 November 2012
Issue: 7540 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Goldsmith v Grayling

Former attorney general attacks new justice secretary

Lord Goldsmith, the former attorney general, has accused the new justice secretary of failing in his duty to uphold the law.

In a sharply worded letter to The Times this week, Lord Goldsmith said Chris Grayling had “failed” his first test by “telling Parliament in effect that it could disregard the ruling of the European Court of Human Rights” on prisoners’ votes. This was “the opposite of upholding the rule of law”, he said.

Lord Goldsmith, who referred in the letter to the fact Grayling is not a lawyer, concluded: “One cannot imagine former Lords Chancellor such as Hailsham, Mackay or Irvine making this mistake.”

The European Court of Human Rights has ruled that the UK’s blanket ban on prisoners being allowed to vote is unlawful.

Grayling told MPs last week that Parliament was sovereign and that they could, if they wished, reject the court’s ruling. He added there would be a political cost to doing this. He laid a draft Bill before Parliament with options of keeping the blanket ban or giving the vote to prisoners sentenced to four years or six months.

Up to 3,000 prisoners could bring compensation claims for breach of their human rights if the government continues with a blanket ban.

Issue: 7540 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll