header-logo header-logo

15 July 2010
Issue: 7426 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

A good day for badgers

Welsh badgers have won a reprieve after the Court of Appeal ruled proposals for a cull unlawful.

The cull was proposed to help stem the spread of bovine TB, which has affected 64% of cattle herds in the area in the last six years.
However, judges held the Tuberculosis Eradication (Wales) Order 2009 made by the Minister for Rural Affairs in Wales unlawful, in Badger Trust v Welsh Ministers [2010] EWCA Civ 807.

They ruled the 2009 Order permitting culling in the whole of Wales was not supported by evidence and should be restricted to the pilot area and further held that Welsh ministers acted unlawfully in misinterpreting s 21 of the Animal Health Act 1981 as giving them power to cull if they could achieve a potential reduction in TB which was merely more than trivial or insignificant, and that they failed to carry out a balancing exercise to weigh up the harm involved to badgers against the potential benefit to cattle herds.

Lord Justice Stanley Burton says: “If the cull authorised by such an order were effective, the badger, an indigenous species, would be eradicated and become extinct in this country. I doubt that this is what Parliament envisaged or authorised when enacting s 21.”
 

Issue: 7426 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll