header-logo header-logo

07 August 2015 / Dov Ohrenstein
Issue: 7664 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

In good faith?

nlj_7664_ohrenstein

What is the impact of the good faith doctrine on commercial contracts, asks Dov Ohrenstein

As the Hon Marilyn Warren AC, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Victoria, wrote: “Whole forests have been felled to produce judicial and academic writing on the meaning of good faith in contract law” (see “Good faith: Where are we at?” (2010) 34 Melbourne University Law Review 344, 345).

Historically, the courts have been reluctant to adopt a doctrine of good faith in English contract law and generally took the approach that there is no legal principle of good faith in dealings between commercial contractual parties. For example:

  • Lord Steyn, wrote in 1997: “I have no heroic suggestion for the introduction of a general duty of good faith in our contract law. It is not necessary” (“Contract Law: Fulfilling the Reasonable Expectations of Honest Men” (1997) 133 Law Quarterly Review 433, 439).
  • Lord Justice Bingham stated in Interfoto Picture Library Ltd v Stiletto Visual Programmes [1989] QB 433, [1988] 1 All ER 348: “In many civil law systems, and
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll