header-logo header-logo

07 August 2015 / Dov Ohrenstein
Issue: 7664 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

In good faith?

nlj_7664_ohrenstein

What is the impact of the good faith doctrine on commercial contracts, asks Dov Ohrenstein

As the Hon Marilyn Warren AC, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Victoria, wrote: “Whole forests have been felled to produce judicial and academic writing on the meaning of good faith in contract law” (see “Good faith: Where are we at?” (2010) 34 Melbourne University Law Review 344, 345).

Historically, the courts have been reluctant to adopt a doctrine of good faith in English contract law and generally took the approach that there is no legal principle of good faith in dealings between commercial contractual parties. For example:

  • Lord Steyn, wrote in 1997: “I have no heroic suggestion for the introduction of a general duty of good faith in our contract law. It is not necessary” (“Contract Law: Fulfilling the Reasonable Expectations of Honest Men” (1997) 133 Law Quarterly Review 433, 439).
  • Lord Justice Bingham stated in Interfoto Picture Library Ltd v Stiletto Visual Programmes [1989] QB 433, [1988] 1 All ER 348: “In many civil law systems, and
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Firm names partner as London office managing partner

Bellevue Law—Sally Hall

Bellevue Law—Sally Hall

Employment boutique strengthens data protection and privacy offering with senior consultant hire

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

NEWS
Personal injury lawyers have welcomed a government U-turn on a ‘substantial prejudice’ defence that risked enabling defendants in child sexual abuse civil cases to have proceedings against them dropped
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll