header-logo header-logo

07 August 2015 / Dov Ohrenstein
Issue: 7664 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

In good faith?

nlj_7664_ohrenstein

What is the impact of the good faith doctrine on commercial contracts, asks Dov Ohrenstein

As the Hon Marilyn Warren AC, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Victoria, wrote: “Whole forests have been felled to produce judicial and academic writing on the meaning of good faith in contract law” (see “Good faith: Where are we at?” (2010) 34 Melbourne University Law Review 344, 345).

Historically, the courts have been reluctant to adopt a doctrine of good faith in English contract law and generally took the approach that there is no legal principle of good faith in dealings between commercial contractual parties. For example:

  • Lord Steyn, wrote in 1997: “I have no heroic suggestion for the introduction of a general duty of good faith in our contract law. It is not necessary” (“Contract Law: Fulfilling the Reasonable Expectations of Honest Men” (1997) 133 Law Quarterly Review 433, 439).
  • Lord Justice Bingham stated in Interfoto Picture Library Ltd v Stiletto Visual Programmes [1989] QB 433, [1988] 1 All ER 348: “In many civil law systems, and
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll