header-logo header-logo

11 November 2016 / Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC
Issue: 7722 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

A good-natured Lord Chancellor

nlj_7722_backpage

Geoffrey Bindman QC exposes the ambiguous character of Lord Eldon

The school I attended in Newcastle can claim a modest place in legal history. Founded in 1545, it educated in the 18th century the brothers John and William Scott, who later became the celebrated judges Lord Eldon and Lord Stowell. Eldon was Lord Chancellor of England for 25 years—the longest serving in our history. He is nowadays best known as the model for the pedantic and procrastinating Lord Chancellor in Charles Dickens’ Bleak House, in which he presided over the fictitious but not implausible case of Jarndyce v Jarndyce. Stowell became the father of Admiralty law. Bleak House begins with the famous description of the fog-bound Court of Chancery: “Jarndyce and Jarndyce drones on. This scarecrow of a suit has, in the course of time, become so complicated that no man alive knows what it means.”

Dickens’ day

In his preface Dickens mentions two actual cases, one of them a dispute over the will of Charles Day, a boot

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll