header-logo header-logo

A good-natured Lord Chancellor

11 November 2016 / Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC
Issue: 7722 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail
nlj_7722_backpage

Geoffrey Bindman QC exposes the ambiguous character of Lord Eldon

The school I attended in Newcastle can claim a modest place in legal history. Founded in 1545, it educated in the 18th century the brothers John and William Scott, who later became the celebrated judges Lord Eldon and Lord Stowell. Eldon was Lord Chancellor of England for 25 years—the longest serving in our history. He is nowadays best known as the model for the pedantic and procrastinating Lord Chancellor in Charles Dickens’ Bleak House, in which he presided over the fictitious but not implausible case of Jarndyce v Jarndyce. Stowell became the father of Admiralty law. Bleak House begins with the famous description of the fog-bound Court of Chancery: “Jarndyce and Jarndyce drones on. This scarecrow of a suit has, in the course of time, become so complicated that no man alive knows what it means.”

Dickens’ day

In his preface Dickens mentions two actual cases, one of them a dispute over the will of Charles Day, a boot

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

HFW—Guy Marrison

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

Morrison Foerster—Jenny Galloway & Luke Rowland

Morrison Foerster—Jenny Galloway & Luke Rowland

Firm grows London practice with two partner promotions

Hogan Lovells—David Hansom

Hogan Lovells—David Hansom

Government contracts and procurement practice expands with London partner hire

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll