Good Will hunting

Paul Hewitt & Paola Fudakowska report on codicils & statutory legacies

Frank Crispin Esson v Robert Barrie Esson and 11 others [2009] EWHC 3045 (Ch) concerned the construction of codicil. Dorothy Clements (D) died in 2006, survived by three children from her first marriage and three stepchildren by her second marriage. Her second husband, Norman (N), predeceased her in 2005. D and N made mirror wills in 1996, so that on D’s death, her interest in the matrimonial home passed to her own children and absolute residue passed to her three children and three stepchildren in equal shares.

However, in 2002, D had inherited a share of her own mother’s estate, which she invested in a separate bank account. She then executed an undated home-made codicil. It stated that N “is in full agreement that should I predecease him, all monies in this account should be divided equally between my grandchildren…”.

If interpreted literally, the gift was conditional on D predeceasing N. As N had predeceased D, this meant the money fell

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

Good Will hunting

Paul Hewitt & Paola Fudakowska report on codicils & statutory legacies

If interpreted literally, the gift was conditional on D predeceasing N. As N had predeceased D, this meant the money fell

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

SourceURL:

Links:

E-newsletter Sign-Up

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS

Read All

NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders

Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners

NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do

A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent

Your magistrates’ court needs you!

Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process

NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed

Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’

NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits

A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’

Error message

Good Will hunting

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green