header-logo header-logo

15 April 2020 / Sinead O’Callaghan
Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Good will hunting

Sinead O’Callaghan discusses testamentary capacity in the wake of the coronavirus pandemic
  • Succession challenges: arguments regarding the necessary capacity of the testator.
  • Allegations of insufficient testamentary capacity: Todd v Parsons & Ors.
  • Advice for practitioners: audio or video recordings and expert evidence.

There has always been much discussion around the subject of evidencing testamentary capacity both before and after the death of a testator. It is perhaps unsurprising that succession challenges are often based on arguments to the effect that either the testator lacked the necessary capacity to make a will when they signed it (so that the will is void) or that the deceased was acting under duress or undue influence or that fraudulent calumny was in play (so that the will should be set aside).

The golden rule for practitioners has always been that a medical opinion should be obtained from an appropriately qualified professional when the capacity of a client is in any doubt. However, facilitating this is frequently impractical, particularly when dealing

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll