header-logo header-logo

15 April 2020 / Sinead O’Callaghan
Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Good will hunting

Sinead O’Callaghan discusses testamentary capacity in the wake of the coronavirus pandemic
  • Succession challenges: arguments regarding the necessary capacity of the testator.
  • Allegations of insufficient testamentary capacity: Todd v Parsons & Ors.
  • Advice for practitioners: audio or video recordings and expert evidence.

There has always been much discussion around the subject of evidencing testamentary capacity both before and after the death of a testator. It is perhaps unsurprising that succession challenges are often based on arguments to the effect that either the testator lacked the necessary capacity to make a will when they signed it (so that the will is void) or that the deceased was acting under duress or undue influence or that fraudulent calumny was in play (so that the will should be set aside).

The golden rule for practitioners has always been that a medical opinion should be obtained from an appropriately qualified professional when the capacity of a client is in any doubt. However, facilitating this is frequently impractical, particularly when dealing

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll