header-logo header-logo

Good will hunting

15 April 2020 / Sinead O’Callaghan
Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail
Sinead O’Callaghan discusses testamentary capacity in the wake of the coronavirus pandemic
  • Succession challenges: arguments regarding the necessary capacity of the testator.
  • Allegations of insufficient testamentary capacity: Todd v Parsons & Ors.
  • Advice for practitioners: audio or video recordings and expert evidence.

There has always been much discussion around the subject of evidencing testamentary capacity both before and after the death of a testator. It is perhaps unsurprising that succession challenges are often based on arguments to the effect that either the testator lacked the necessary capacity to make a will when they signed it (so that the will is void) or that the deceased was acting under duress or undue influence or that fraudulent calumny was in play (so that the will should be set aside).

The golden rule for practitioners has always been that a medical opinion should be obtained from an appropriately qualified professional when the capacity of a client is in any doubt. However, facilitating this is frequently impractical, particularly when dealing

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hill Dickinson—Paul Matthews, Liz Graham & Sarah Pace

Hill Dickinson—Paul Matthews, Liz Graham & Sarah Pace

Leeds office strengthened with triple partner hire

Clarke Willmott—Oksana Howard

Clarke Willmott—Oksana Howard

Corporate lawyer joins as partner in London office

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll