header-logo header-logo

Google favoured in trademark dispute

25 September 2009
Issue: 7386 / Categories: Legal News , Media , Intellectual property
printer mail-detail

Google has received encouraging news in its long-running legal battle over whether its AdWords service infringes trademark rights.

Google has received encouraging news in its long-running legal battle over whether its AdWords service infringes trademark rights.

The AdWords service allows advertisers to purchase the right to have their advert displayed when certain keywords are typed into the Google search engine.

Louis Vuitton complained that adverts for counterfeit items popped up when internet users searched for the company, which infringed their trademark rights.

The resulting case was referred to the European Court of Justice.
Delivering his opinion in the joined cases of C-236/08, C-237/08 and C- 238/08, Advocate General Poiares Maduro said Google did not infringe anyone’s trademark rights by selling keywords corresponding to those trademarks.

An advocate general’s opinion is not legally binding on the court, but is usually followed.

Maduro said: “The question, as put to the court, is whether the use of a keyword which corresponds to a trade mark can, in itself, be regarded as a use of that trade mark which is subject to the consent of its proprietor.”

On whether an infringement had taken place, he said: “Trade mark proprietors have no legal problem in tackling counterfeit sites, as such sites are clearly involved in trade mark infringements; however, the practical difficulties of doing so should not be ignored.”

 

Issue: 7386 / Categories: Legal News , Media , Intellectual property
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll