header-logo header-logo

Google favoured in trademark dispute

25 September 2009
Issue: 7386 / Categories: Legal News , Media , Intellectual property
printer mail-detail

Google has received encouraging news in its long-running legal battle over whether its AdWords service infringes trademark rights.

Google has received encouraging news in its long-running legal battle over whether its AdWords service infringes trademark rights.

The AdWords service allows advertisers to purchase the right to have their advert displayed when certain keywords are typed into the Google search engine.

Louis Vuitton complained that adverts for counterfeit items popped up when internet users searched for the company, which infringed their trademark rights.

The resulting case was referred to the European Court of Justice.
Delivering his opinion in the joined cases of C-236/08, C-237/08 and C- 238/08, Advocate General Poiares Maduro said Google did not infringe anyone’s trademark rights by selling keywords corresponding to those trademarks.

An advocate general’s opinion is not legally binding on the court, but is usually followed.

Maduro said: “The question, as put to the court, is whether the use of a keyword which corresponds to a trade mark can, in itself, be regarded as a use of that trade mark which is subject to the consent of its proprietor.”

On whether an infringement had taken place, he said: “Trade mark proprietors have no legal problem in tackling counterfeit sites, as such sites are clearly involved in trade mark infringements; however, the practical difficulties of doing so should not be ignored.”

 

Issue: 7386 / Categories: Legal News , Media , Intellectual property
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Red Lion Chambers—Maurice MacSweeney

Red Lion Chambers—Maurice MacSweeney

Set creates new client and business development role amid growth

Kingsley Napley—Tim Lowles

Kingsley Napley—Tim Lowles

Sports disputes practice launchedwith partner appointment

mfg Solicitors—Tom Evans

mfg Solicitors—Tom Evans

Tax and succession planning offering expands with returning partner

NEWS
The rank of King’s Counsel (KC) has been awarded to 96 barristers, and no solicitors, in the latest silk round
Neurotechnology is poised to transform contract law—and unsettle it. Writing in NLJ this week, Harry Lambert, barrister at Outer Temple Chambers and founder of the Centre for Neurotechnology & Law, and Dr Michelle Sharpe, barrister at the Victorian Bar, explore how brain–computer interfaces could both prove and undermine consent
Comparators remain the fault line of discrimination law. In this week's NLJ, Anjali Malik, partner at Bellevue Law, and Mukhtiar Singh, barrister at Doughty Street Chambers, review a bumper year of appellate guidance clarifying how tribunals should approach ‘actual’ and ‘evidential’ comparators. A new six-stage framework stresses a simple starting point: identify the treatment first
In cross-border divorces, domicile can decide everything. In NLJ this week, Jennifer Headon, legal director and head of international family, Isobel Inkley, solicitor, and Fiona Collins, trainee solicitor, all at Birketts LLP, unpack a Court of Appeal ruling that re-centres nuance in jurisdiction disputes. The court held that once a domicile of choice is established, the burden lies on the party asserting its loss
Early determination is no longer a novelty in arbitration. In NLJ this week, Gustavo Moser, arbitration specialist lawyer at Lexis+, charts the global embrace of summary disposal powers, now embedded in the Arbitration Act 1996 and mirrored worldwide. Tribunals may swiftly dismiss claims with ‘no real prospect of succeeding’, but only if fairness is preserved
back-to-top-scroll