header-logo header-logo

25 September 2019
Issue: 7857 / Categories: Legal News , Technology , Data protection , Commercial , EU
printer mail-detail

Google wins privacy case

The right to be forgotten is restricted to EU member states, the European Court of Justice (CJEU) has held in a landmark victory for Google.

The case arose after a French regulator fined the US search engine €100,000 in 2015 and ordered it to delete listings from its global search results. Google challenged the decision.

Ruling in Google v CNIL (C-507/17), the CJEU stated there was currently ‘no obligation under EU law, for a search engine operator who grants a request for dereferencing made by a data subject... to carry out such a dereferencing on all the versions of its search engine’.

Under the right to be forgotten, citizens can force search engines to remove links to information about them, in certain circumstances.

Jane Ashford-Thom, reputation protection associate at Harbottle & Lewis, said: ‘The CJEU’s judgment reaffirms the fact that the right to be forgotten must be applied rigorously across all EU member states, so that attempts to search for infringing material from an EU member state will be fruitless.’

Issue: 7857 / Categories: Legal News , Technology , Data protection , Commercial , EU
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

DWF—11 appointments

DWF—11 appointments

DWF strengthens North West teams with 11 newly qualified solicitors

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll