header-logo header-logo

25 September 2019
Issue: 7857 / Categories: Legal News , Technology , Data protection , Commercial , EU
printer mail-detail

Google wins privacy case

The right to be forgotten is restricted to EU member states, the European Court of Justice (CJEU) has held in a landmark victory for Google.

The case arose after a French regulator fined the US search engine €100,000 in 2015 and ordered it to delete listings from its global search results. Google challenged the decision.

Ruling in Google v CNIL (C-507/17), the CJEU stated there was currently ‘no obligation under EU law, for a search engine operator who grants a request for dereferencing made by a data subject... to carry out such a dereferencing on all the versions of its search engine’.

Under the right to be forgotten, citizens can force search engines to remove links to information about them, in certain circumstances.

Jane Ashford-Thom, reputation protection associate at Harbottle & Lewis, said: ‘The CJEU’s judgment reaffirms the fact that the right to be forgotten must be applied rigorously across all EU member states, so that attempts to search for infringing material from an EU member state will be fruitless.’

Issue: 7857 / Categories: Legal News , Technology , Data protection , Commercial , EU
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll