header-logo header-logo

11 August 2016
Issue: 7711 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Government child abuse inquiry dilemma

New chair needs to have a background in issues relating to child abuse

The resignation of Dame Lowell Goddard as chair of the Independent Inquiry into Child Sex Abuse (IICSA) earlier this month—the third chair to resign since the inquiry was established in 2014—has caused anguish among abuse survivors and a headache for the new Home Secretary. 

Whoever takes up the mantle and oversees the most ambitious public inquiry ever established in England and Wales will have to contend with criticism that the inquiry’s remit is impossibly wide, as well as questions about whether the inquiry can continue in its current format, or needs to be reformed. 

In her resignation statement Dame Lowell referred to a “legacy of failure” which had been hard to shake off, adding that it would have been better to have started afresh.

Writing for NLJ online this weekRichard Scorer, an abuse lawyer at Slater & Gordon Lawyers (UK), who represents 50 abuse survivors in the inquiry, says the new chair will need to ensure that the inquiry’s nature and purpose is better communicated to the public at large. “In the public mind the inquiry has become overly conflated with some of the more lurid abuse allegations featured in the media,” he says.

According to Scorer, because the chair exercises judicial powers, he or she probably needs to be a lawyer, preferably a judge. “Technically, a statutory inquiry does not require a legal chair. However, given the gravity of the issues being considered by the inquiry, and the likely resistance from some of the institutions under scrutiny, a lawyer is probably required. But equally, the new chair needs to have a background in issues relating to child abuse, otherwise he or she would face an impossibly steep learning curve,” he says.

The Home Secretary, Amber Rudd, has confirmed that the inquiry’s work will continue without delay and that its success remains a priority for the government. Issue papers asking for comments on the effectiveness of the criminal compensation and the civil justice systems for victims and survivors of child sexual abuse in England and Wales are live on the inquiry’s website. The closing date for submissions is noon on 29 September 2016.

Issue: 7711 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll