header-logo header-logo

11 August 2016
Issue: 7711 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Government child abuse inquiry dilemma

New chair needs to have a background in issues relating to child abuse

The resignation of Dame Lowell Goddard as chair of the Independent Inquiry into Child Sex Abuse (IICSA) earlier this month—the third chair to resign since the inquiry was established in 2014—has caused anguish among abuse survivors and a headache for the new Home Secretary. 

Whoever takes up the mantle and oversees the most ambitious public inquiry ever established in England and Wales will have to contend with criticism that the inquiry’s remit is impossibly wide, as well as questions about whether the inquiry can continue in its current format, or needs to be reformed. 

In her resignation statement Dame Lowell referred to a “legacy of failure” which had been hard to shake off, adding that it would have been better to have started afresh.

Writing for NLJ online this weekRichard Scorer, an abuse lawyer at Slater & Gordon Lawyers (UK), who represents 50 abuse survivors in the inquiry, says the new chair will need to ensure that the inquiry’s nature and purpose is better communicated to the public at large. “In the public mind the inquiry has become overly conflated with some of the more lurid abuse allegations featured in the media,” he says.

According to Scorer, because the chair exercises judicial powers, he or she probably needs to be a lawyer, preferably a judge. “Technically, a statutory inquiry does not require a legal chair. However, given the gravity of the issues being considered by the inquiry, and the likely resistance from some of the institutions under scrutiny, a lawyer is probably required. But equally, the new chair needs to have a background in issues relating to child abuse, otherwise he or she would face an impossibly steep learning curve,” he says.

The Home Secretary, Amber Rudd, has confirmed that the inquiry’s work will continue without delay and that its success remains a priority for the government. Issue papers asking for comments on the effectiveness of the criminal compensation and the civil justice systems for victims and survivors of child sexual abuse in England and Wales are live on the inquiry’s website. The closing date for submissions is noon on 29 September 2016.

Issue: 7711 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll